The funny thing is people are more impressed by 'big name' players Than what they see I guess.
Well would have preferred to start with Deuce over Kane, that's for sure.
The funny thing is people are more impressed by 'big name' players Than what they see I guess.
The funny thing is people are more impressed by 'big name' players Than what they see I guess.
I see the argument is still "at least he's not as **** as the guy who got fired"
Let's be clear, the benchmark (AVB's league results) got a guy who got record league points total last year fired in less than 6 month (i.e. they are terrible)
So TS results would need to be significantly better.
Can someone put up a simple Played, win, lose draw, GF, GA table
And my expectation is the next two game at best will ad L2 GA6 to it.
I see the argument is still "at least he's not as **** as the guy who got fired"
Let's be clear, the benchmark (AVB's league results) got a guy who got record league points total last year fired in less than 6 month (i.e. they are terrible)
So TS results would need to be significantly better.
Can someone put up a simple Played, win, lose draw, GF, GA table
And my expectation is the next two game at best will ad L2 GA6 to it.
Because he'd had to oversee the loss of our 4 world class players (Modric, vdV, King and Bale) and overhaul the creaking squad that Redknapp had left him due to his short-termist approach.
And that all happened in 15 months.
And he largely maintained our position in that time and would soon have been ready to start pushing on again.
Just to clarify, you're saying AVB's results this season were TERRIBLE? We were 7th and as close to 4th if not closer than we are now.
Enough to get him fired .. or are you saying the guy wasn't fired on results?
1) We didn't fire him
2) We didn't fire him
3) We didn't fire him
He wanted to leave. We wanted him to leave. That's not a sacking in my book. I think we were right in doing so, if his heart wasn't in it, why keep him appointed? Sherwood was always an interim solution. Bring on Van Gaal or De Boer come the summer. Kick out Baldini, sell all the deadwood and let the new manager choose his own players. Yet another re-start.
1) We didn't fire him
2) We didn't fire him
3) We didn't fire him
He wanted to leave. We wanted him to leave. That's not a sacking in my book. I think we were right in doing so, if his heart wasn't in it, why keep him appointed? Sherwood was always an interim solution. Bring on Van Gaal or De Boer come the summer. Kick out Baldini, sell all the deadwood and let the new manager choose his own players. Yet another re-start.
Lets' look at that table
- Position not really relevant, as Saudi Sportswashing Machine/Everton have dropped off more than we improved
- Gap to 4th was 5 points, 3rd was 6, now is 4 & 6, but 4th place team has multiple games in hand, 3rd has 1, so potentially gap is more.
- In 3 games, it will be 16 game each, optimistically -> TS = P16, W9, D2, L5, GD+1
So TS gets 1 more win, 1 less draw, 1 more loss and a slight improvement to GD than the guy who got fired?
Sorry, don't see what the attraction is.
Yes both of them are similar.
I've no idea why these people think it was stupid to sack AVB.
Yes both of them are similar.
I've no idea why these people think it was stupid to sack AVB.
Mate if TS as our interim manager, I'd have much less of an issue.
He isn't, he has an 18 month contract and we can speculate all we want, that is the only fact.
i think your first point answers the second.
we seemingly sacked/replaced the manager mid season to give someone with no experience a go - just seems rather futile, especially when you take in to account the player turnover in the summer which i (and possibly others) believe can go some way to explain the inconsistency of the season so far. give the man a year to mold the team - what did we expect Sherwood to be able to do with half a season anyway?
I still feel it was the right decision and I don't think we would be much better or worse off now if he had stayed in charge although I definitely think we would be slightly further down the table, maybe 8th or 9th. Hindsight is a wonderful thing and I initially wanted AVB appointed but I was concerned by the end of last season that actually we had regressed in terms of our dynamism and fluency. Obviously that increased once Bale was sold and at the end I just wanted him to go really.
For me, I wish that in the summer of 2011 we had paid off Redknapp after the collapse at the end of 2010-11 season and gone for Ancelotti as he was angling for a job in London once he had left Chelsea. He was till hangining around and waiting, sometimes making it clear in the media he wanted to stay in London and it was only PSG coming in for him in February 2012 that meant we were unable to approach him, come the end of that 2011-12 season. I am pretty sure that had he remained unemployed up to the summer of 2012 then he would have become our manager. Failing that, I look at 2012 and believe that we made a mistake going for AVB instead of Martinez.
But the guy with no experience did just as good. Sherwood has shown just how bad AVB was.
That in itself is a useful exercise.
Also the whole Sherwood plotting in the background issue is now played out.
A new manager will have a clean slate.
And the players are currently getting a well deserved kick in the ****.
But the guy with no experience did just as good. Sherwood has shown just how bad AVB was.
That in itself is a useful exercise.
Also the whole Sherwood plotting in the background issue is now played out.
A new manager will have a clean slate.
And the players are currently getting a well deserved kick in the ****.