And if he tried to sell Dele Alli to buy Tom Carroll (or whoever the current equivalent of Kenwyne Jones is).probably
depends on mitigating circumstances and his management of the squad across the whole season
And if he tried to sell Dele Alli to buy Tom Carroll (or whoever the current equivalent of Kenwyne Jones is).probably
depends on mitigating circumstances and his management of the squad across the whole season
"He gets the best out of players, everybody works hard for him and that shows on the pitch. Every manager has to have their distance from the players but he lets us go out there and express ourselves, and if a manager does that he’s going to see the best of his players."
"I think it was the right time for me to go, but I will always be thankful to Tottenham for everything they did for me. I became a better player there and they pushed me to this level where I am at the moment."
Modrić agreed transfer terms with Tottenham Hotspur on 26 April 2008. He was the first of many summer signings for coach Juande Ramos and was also the Premier League's first summer transfer.[23] After signing a six-year contract, Tottenham confirmed the fee paid was £16.5 million, equalling the club's record fee set by Darren Bent's move in 2007.[24] Modrić made his competitive Premier League debut on 16 August in a match that ended in a 2–1 defeat by Middlesbrough at the Riverside Stadium in Spurs' first match of the 2008–09 season.[25]
Modrić had a slow start at Tottenham; he suffered from a knee injury early in his career there and was labelled as a "light-weight" by sections of the media,[3][26] and Arsene Wenger.[27] This coincided with his poor form, leading to concerns both for himself and Croatia manager Slaven Bilić.[28] Modrić spent his early days at a position of number 10, before being shifted to the left wing to play alongsideWilson Palacios.[27] Spurs team-mate Tom Huddlestone later said, "his versatility was probably a blessing and a curse, he was that good that he had to play out of position for a bit".[27]
After the appointment of manager Harry Redknapp, Modrić was given a more familiar role as a central- or left-sided midfielder, allowing him to have more influence on the team and use his footballing talent more productively, for example in a 4–4 draw with arch-rivalsArsenal on 29 October.[29] Since this performance, his form improved considerably, coinciding with his club's improved performance in the league. Redknapp recognised Modrić's value to his side, planning to shape his new team around the Croatian playmaker.[30] Modrić scored his first competitive goal at Tottenham in a 2–2 draw against Spartak Moscow during the UEFA Cup group stages on 18 December 2008.[31] He scored his first Premier League goals against Saudi Sportswashing Machine in an away defeat on 21 December, a home win in the third round of the FA Cup against Wigan on 2 January 2009, and in an away defeat against Manchester United on 25 April 2009.[32]
Using Modrić in his former position from Dinamo Zagreb days made him more effective with inspirational performances against Stoke City,[33] Hull City,[34] and most notably on 21 March when he scored the only goal in a win against Chelsea.[35]
based on season starting expectations yes
had the same people been asked again mid season (on the latter 2) the expectation would have been higher
we threw away massive point advantages both seasons, once is forgivable, twice is incompetence
Didn't we also throw away big point leads under AVB ("they're in a negative spiral") And Pochettino though?based on season starting expectations yes
had the same people been asked again mid season (on the latter 2) the expectation would have been higher
we threw away massive point advantages both seasons, once is forgivable, twice is incompetence
Didn't we also throw away big point leads under AVB ("they're in a negative spiral") And Pochettino though?
Iirc strictly speaking it was 10 points, not 13, the other three were down to Arse's game in hand. 'Throwing' even a ten point lead sounds bad but let's not forget that Woolwich went on an unbelievable end-of-season run. So it was probably more a case of the South London wanderers having had their bad run of results earlier in the season whereas ours came right at the end.yes we did (not the 13 points that Harry had though iirc)
its not that it happened, it's that exactly the same thing happened at the exact time the following season because he had done nothing to address it, it was the result of negligence and short termism
Iirc strictly speaking it was 10 points, not 13, the other three were down to Arse's game in hand. 'Throwing' even a ten point lead sounds bad but let's not forget that Woolwich went on an unbelievable end-of-season run. So it was probably more a case of the South London wanderers having had their bad run of results earlier in the season whereas ours came right at the end.
I could be wrong here but I don't think teams are awarded points until the game is finished.... Although I believe that David Sullivan is investigating the possibility of West Ham adding the 'half time trophy' to their 'London League Winners* *excluding Watford trophy'were we not 2-0 up on them at one point making it 13?
There is no doubt that Redknapp did well for us and a number of players improved their overall performances under his coaching team. One that particularly stands out was BAE who went from being an inconsistent youngster to being one of the best left backs in the PL. He also handled Ade very well.To just pick up on the 'not as good as he should've done' comment. How well should Redknapp have done then? Before each of his 3 full seasons started most people and pundits seemed to think that we would finish 5th or 6th. Yet he took us to 4th, 5th, 4th so was on par with or better than expected in each season.