charlietheyid
Banned
Lloris / Courtois
Vertonghen / Rami
Hazard / Muniain
Lllorente / Remy
Vertonghen / Rami
Hazard / Muniain
Lllorente / Remy
Hadn't realised I'd put in a left back to be honest! Maybe your seeing things.
always good to see the whole concept of a British team die.......
how long before a Spurs side without and Englishman or a British player in it?
No but he did think Pav and Crouch were better players then him, are you telling me you think they are as well.
Stock Clearance!
Come on Harry, bargin! bring in some maturity and experience to help the youngsters through Feb and March next year
Gattuso 34
Inzaghi 38
Nesta 37
Really? When did he say that?
When do you think #-o
'The lad is a very good goalscorer and I'm still interested in him.
Read more: http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/footba...knapp-admits-huntelaar-interest#ixzz1ub7DUesD
Funny that though because we could have had him the summer of 2010 and Redknapp dithered.
'The lad is a very good goalscorer and I'm still interested in him.
Read more: http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/footba...knapp-admits-huntelaar-interest#ixzz1ub7DUesD
Funny that though because we could have had him the summer of 2010 and Redknapp dithered.
I thought Levy conducted all our transfer business, including the timings of it etc. Prime example being Parker. Redknapp said he wanted him all along and was pushing, pushing, pushing for him and yet despite this we STILL didn't sign him until the end of August. How do you know that Redknapp wasn't pushing that hard for Huntelaar?
Proof that it was Redknapp dithering? Or is that your perception?
I thought Levy conducted all our transfer business, including the timings of it etc. Prime example being Parker. Redknapp said he wanted him all along and was pushing, pushing, pushing for him and yet despite this we STILL didn't sign him until the end of August. How do you know that Redknapp wasn't pushing that hard for Huntelaar?
Believe me he did and that's all i am going to say on it, If you do not want to believe me so be it. As is i have said he thought that Pav and Crouch were better and he did not see the point of bringing in a player who does not improve what we had.
Levy backed Arry in front of the board in order to justify spending such amount on a older player with no re sale. Double check your facts.
Is this ITK on your part or do you have something factual to back this up?
Funny thing is, Pav lovers always said that Redknapp hated Pav so either they're wrong or you are on that point.
Levy backed Arry in front of the board in order to justify spending such amount on a older player with no re sale. Double check your facts.
And it happened too late in the day for my liking. And Levy is the GHod. The Board could all scream NOOOOO and Levy can over rule every single one of them. Excuse not valid. Next rebuttal attempt please.
Actually I've just understood the ramifications of this post! Against media proof you have claimed our wages have doubled and it's Redknapp's fault and Levy is not to blame (interesting view point, does Redknapp have something over Levy and blackmailing him? Levy seems like a strong personality and I can't imagine that Redknapp would've hoodwinked him over finances).
Now you're saying that Levy backed Redknapp in front of the Board? How do you know this? Do you have links with the Board?