StephenH
David Ginola
Walnut?! We might as well bring Aaron Lennon back (or Darren Anderton or Ruel Fox).
Aaron (big fan) bless him is dreadful these days. Walcott is still far better. But as I thought....
Walnut?! We might as well bring Aaron Lennon back (or Darren Anderton or Ruel Fox).
Have you met Gutter Boy?3 out of 4? Dude you have plucked that out of thin air.
.
I would buy Walcott.
there I said it!
(yes he probably wouldn't come etc but I would)
??????????????
Now that I could get on board with....It’s a free country.
I also would have loved Geroud instead of Llorente
It’s a free country.
I also would have loved Geroud instead of Llorente
It’s a free country.
I also would have loved Geroud instead of Llorente
You and need to stick together here, I say swop son for Walcott
I have no issues in signing any player from any club if I think they will improve us (I was massively for signing Gallas for example). However I think that Walcott has found his level at Everton.Still think he has much to offer and he's rapid - wont happen though due to tribalism
Giroud would've been a great option for us. He is a very good player as his goal record has consistently proven. Walcott on the other hand is a player who always has massively flattered to deceive.It’s a free country.
I also would have loved Geroud instead of Llorente
I have no issues in signing any player from any club if I think they will improve us (I was massively for signing Gallas for example). However I think that Walcott has found his level at Everton.
If Walcott came to Spurs he would be behind Moura, Lamela and Son for a place in our team. I really don't think we need to do too much to our attack this summer. I would look to let both Llorente and Jansen go and try to sign one top class player who can both play from wide positions and through the centre. Any of Martial, Zaha or even Bale would be brilliant signings I think. Other than that I think we should just stick with what we have in terms of our attacking options.
Giroud would've been a great option for us. He is a very good player as his goal record has consistently proven. Walcott on the other hand is a player who always has massively flattered to deceive.
Why the fudge are you lot discussing Walcott? Who's responsible for this?
Because he’s the future of England. A young, fast player who will only improve.Why the fudge are you lot discussing Walcott? Who's responsible for this?
Walcott wasn't good enough for Arsenal - a club who we are currently better than and (hopefully) have ambitions to continue to be better than. We either need to be taking the rejects of the real top moneybags clubs (Real, Barca, Bayern, PSG) or purchasing the better/best players at the clubs of similar/lower standing to ourselves (i.e. the ones they don't actually want to sell). We aren't going to improve by taking the cast offs from clubs beneath us.Opinion is what it all about.
Walcott is the best player at Everton and was an excellent purchase.
Llorente and Jansen when/if they go will I doubt cover their last years salaries. Both will be fee transfers along with the lad at Burnley.
Bale wages are a not in our league. Zaha still leaves me undecided. Martial is OK
Walcott wasn't good enough for Arsenal - a club who we are currently better than and (hopefully) have ambitions to continue to be better than. We either need to be taking the rejects of the real top moneybags clubs (Real, Barca, Bayern, PSG) or purchasing the better/best players at the clubs of similar/lower standing to ourselves (i.e. the ones they don't actually want to sell). We aren't going to improve by taking the cast offs from clubs beneath us.
Is it a slow day?I’ll tell you Walcott was badly handled by Wenger and Everton did well out of it.
But it just an opinion.
A cast off is always a risk! From even bigger clubs!