• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Sick sick world what is wrong with people

Grays_1890 said:
Two attacks confirmed by people serving in the US military, seems a real odd outcome
Click to expand...
Not sure. There's a lot of people who've served in the US military. Factor in that those are the ones who probably have a better understanding of how to create IEDs, it's probably not that unlikely.

A better question would be to ask why, after years of apparently exemplary service, a person would go full depart? A high probability guess would be one involving sky fairies.
 
scaramanga said:
So the religion of peace strikes again......

Awaits all the people suggesting he just happened to have stolen a truck carrying an IS flag....
Click to expand...

Probably wise to point out that ISIS are not representitive of the vast, vast majority of Muslims.
scaramanga said:
Not sure. There's a lot of people who've served in the US military. Factor in that those are the ones who probably have a better understanding of how to create IEDs, it's probably not that unlikely.

A better question would be to ask why, after years of apparently exemplary service, a person would go full depart? A high probability guess would be one involving sky fairies.
Click to expand...

There is a LOT of PTSD out there. Untreated and undiagnosed. It is hard not to feel it has all combined with extremism/extremist rhetoric.
 
thfcsteff said:
Probably wise to point out that ISIS are not representitive of the vast, vast majority of Muslims.


There is a LOT of PTSD out there. Untreated and undiagnosed. It is hard not to feel it has all combined with extremism/extremist rhetoric.
Click to expand...
There's a huge amount of untreated mental illness in the US. I'd consider religion to be at the very top of that list.
 
scaramanga said:
Not sure, phrases like "...that is my ask" don't sound like the utterances of someone in command of the English language. Although she's American, so it's already a shallow pool.
Click to expand...

Have you heard the phrase "It's a big ask" before? Perhaps people have described engaging in any kind of debate / conversation with you as such, ring any bells?

"That is what I am asking of you" sounds even more clunky. But it's all opinions.
 
spurspinter1 said:
Have you heard the phrase "It's a big ask" before? Perhaps people have described engaging in any kind of debate / conversation with you as such, ring any bells?

"That is what I am asking of you" sounds even more clunky. But it's all opinions.
Click to expand...
"That is my request" would be properly formed and correct English.

I have heard of that phrase, a public announcement on behalf of an entity such as the FBI is not the place for colloquial language.
 
scaramanga said:
There's a huge amount of untreated mental illness in the US. I'd consider religion to be at the very top of that list.
Click to expand...
Added to that a hugely paranoid society based on the narratives built around global politics, guns (access to and paranoia built around them being readily in society), a weird social narrative that mental health isn't something you want to be seen getting treated does not help either
 
Grays_1890 said:
Added to that a hugely paranoid society based on the narratives built around global politics, guns (access to and paranoia built around them being readily in society), a weird social narrative that mental health isn't something you want to be seen getting treated does not help either
Click to expand...
Sounds like a perfect opportunity for a predatory, misogynistic, stone age belief system to coerce otherwise good people into doing terrible things.....
 
Last edited:
scaramanga said:
"That is my request" would be properly formed and correct English.

I have heard of that phrase, a public announcement on behalf of an entity such as the FBI is not the place for colloquial language.
Click to expand...
So it's coherent language then? That's super brave and big of you to effectively admit you were wrong in your labelling of the situation, you're really coming on leaps and bounds! People have done worse than mix up coherent and colloquial so don't be too embarrassed.

The last thing you'd want to come across as is one of these sad lonely males on the Internet threatened by women / ethnic minorities in positions of responsibility, it's a tough old world for those types these days! They can't even watch an update that has nothing to do with them without making pitiful jabs at appearance and supposed coherency issues, it's dreadfully sad to see but are least you're better than that.
 
spurspinter1 said:
So it's coherent language then? That's super brave and big of you to effectively admit you were wrong in your labelling of the situation, you're really coming on leaps and bounds! People have done worse than mix up coherent and colloquial so don't be too embarrassed.

The last thing you'd want to come across as is one of these sad lonely males on the Internet threatened by women / ethnic minorities in positions of responsibility, it's a tough old world for those types these days! They can't even watch an update that has nothing to do with them without making pitiful jabs at appearance and supposed coherency issues, it's dreadfully sad to see but are least you're better than that.
Click to expand...
That sentence wasn't coherent, no. Your phrase was colloquial, hers was a mess. Furthermore, I was merely responding to your assertion that there must be a racial aspect concerned when, from a 3 second snippet, it was clear that the original poster (whatever his reasoning) was correct.

I have no issue with her appearance, I do take issue with the further destruction of the English language via the promotion of ill equipped people to positions of public attention.

The FBI are far from the worst offenders in that regard, "reality" TV and "influencers" are significantly more guilty .
 
scaramanga said:
That sentence wasn't coherent, no. Your phrase was colloquial, hers was a mess. Furthermore, I was merely responding to your assertion that there must be a racial aspect concerned when, from a 3 second snippet, it was clear that the original poster (whatever his reasoning) was correct.

I have no issue with her appearance, I do take issue with the further destruction of the English language via the promotion of ill equipped people to positions of public attention.

The FBI are far from the worst offenders in that regard, "reality" TV and "influencers" are significantly more guilty .
Click to expand...

1735852221793.png

^This is you honourably defending the English language. The idea that the language is in a constant state of evolution and getting your message across is more important than satisfying whatever you consider to be correct is some lefty commie nonsense. Newspeak for the win, there should definitely only be one way to say something and that should be entirely based on what you currently consider to be the right way at this point in time!
 
spurspinter1 said:
View attachment 18379

^This is you honourably defending the English language. The idea that the language is in a constant state of evolution and getting your message across is more important than satisfying whatever you consider to be correct is some lefty commie nonsense. Newspeak for the win, there should definitely only be one way to say something and that should be entirely based on what you currently consider to be the right way at this point in time!
Click to expand...
If I were interviewing a person and they spoke like her, I'd immediately terminate the interview and save us all our time.

People will (and should) judge others on how they speak - she fails that test.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back