Serge Aurier

[harr1984]

Here's the story @harr1984

https://tinyurl.com/ybejv9ut

Thanks, not sure why my link didn't work?!

 

[milo]

Thanks, not sure why my link didn't work?!

One of the mods has added google to the swear filter so that it is changed to Danny Rose

 

[parklane1]

I think JPBB is joking and being a bit playful with us all and the image he may have given some people of himself in this thread.
The alternative is rather terrible to countenance, so I choose not to right now.

You mean a bit like this joking.

 

[Bullet]

One of the mods has added Danny Rose to the swear filter so that it is changed to Danny Rose

Can you change it back please Milo?

 

[PochettinoPochettinoPochettino]

You mean a bit like this joking.

View attachment 3583

The majority of the people on here don't listen so I'm pretty sure the home office responded with a "your email has been received and we aim to respond within 28 working years".....if they even bothered to at all.

 

[spursfan1976]

Independent says no decision till tomorrow from home office - http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...home-office-paris-saint-germain-a7919136.html

 

[Pirate55]

Here's the story @harr1984

https://tinyurl.com/ybejv9ut

Doesn't look too encouraging for us.

 

[Yiddo]

Pretty sure on social media they were all saying the decision was going to be made today. Seems like this is not going to happen, doubt we were ever in for him. Hasn't he already agreed deals with multiple clubs?

 

[AdamB]

Pretty sure on social media they were all saying the decision was going to be made today

Its the civil service. Timings hardly going to be reliable

 

[JPBB]

Most likely the judge is writing his:her reasons. Perfectly normal for s judge to take time 24 hours to write their reasons for a decision. Particularly as it highly likely whatever his/her decision it will be appealed.

 

[milo]

Most likely the judge is writing his:her reasons. Perfectly normal for s judge to take time 24 hours to write their reasons for a decision. Particularly as it highly likely whatever his/her decision it will be appealed.

There is no judge. If an appeal had been made to the immigration tribunal it would take months to get a hearing and it would be listed here

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-and-asylum-daily-court-lists

 

[milo]

I am sure they will not just wave it through. They promised to pass my representations on to the team dealing with this. I will be gutted if they do not immediately side with my views on this issue.

Most likely the judge is writing his:her reasons. Perfectly normal for s judge to take time 24 hours to write their reasons for a decision. Particularly as it highly likely whatever his/her decision it will be appealed.

These two posts are contradictory as well.

 

[milo]

There is no judge. If an appeal had been made to the immigration tribunal it would take months to get a hearing and it would be listed here

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-and-asylum-daily-court-lists

And you have to appeal to the tribunal within 28 days of the decision. Next.

 

[Mikey10]

https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-psg-transfer-deadline?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

 

[Huddy]

Stay calm, we've ages until Brain Swanson gets a stiffy over his totaliser and Jim White gets his mum to phone him on air pretending to be an agent.

 

[monkeybarry]

Its the civil service. Timings hardly going to be reliable

I sent this message three days yesterday

 

[Danishfurniturelover]

The majority of the people on here don't listen so I'm pretty sure the home office responded with a "your email has been received and we aim to respond within 28 working years".....if they even bothered to at all.

That is what I keep getting from the ticket office when I ask where my bloody membership card is.

 

[JPBB]

There is no judge. If an appeal had been made to the immigration tribunal it would take months to get a hearing and it would be listed here

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-and-asylum-daily-court-lists

We'll find out soon. None of us know chapter and verse of the legislation that this case is being heard under. So you can not say for certain that there is no judge. However, there would be a properly constituted tribunal to hear this and, at least, there would be a chairperson acting as a judge (lower case) and they will have to give reasons for their decision (see human rights act)

As for appealing, it is quite within Spurs' or the Home Office right to make an application to the judge (either lower case or upperr case) for an appeal to be heard at the earliest possible opportunity if there was a compelling reason. Transfer deadline would seem to be one such reason.

 

[JPBB]

These two posts are contradictory as well.

I think they meant the home office team presenting the case against him.

 

[milo]

We'll find out soon. None of us know chapter and verse of the legislation that this case is being heard under. So you can not say that there is no judge. However, there would be a properly constituted tribunal to hear this and, at least, there would be a chairperson acting as a judge (lower case) and they will have to give reasons for their decision (see human rights act)

As for appealing, it is quite within Spurs' or the Home Office right to make an application to the judge (either lower case or upperr case) for the case to be heard at the earliest possible opportunity if there was a compelling reason. Transfer deadline would seem to be one such reason.

I read the guidance last night because what you are saying was so clearly false.

It is always be the applicant who makes an appeal to the First-tier (Immigration) Tribunal and they have 28 days from the original decision to do so. Hearings can be expedited but as doesn't apply because Aurier is out of time.