• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Savinho

I'm not sure about this. He's obviously a good player. But he's also very much a dribbling right winger. Quite similar to the one we bought for £60m a month ago. He's not much of a passer, and he's very one-footed. The balance just doesn't seem right with Kudus already here.
 
Gutter Boy said:
I'm not sure about this. He's obviously a good player. But he's also very much a dribbling right winger. Quite similar to the one we bought for £60m a month ago. He's not much of a passer, and he's very one-footed. The balance just doesn't seem right with Kudus already here.
Click to expand...
Assume he would be played on the left, believe he did at Girona before the City move.

EDIT:

1754867144546.png
 
superspurs said:
Assume he would be played on the left, believe he did at Girona before the City move.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure that would suit him, considering how one-footed he is, and all he does is cut in (he's not a passer or a crosser).

Maybe it would mean Kudus being used in the 10? But again that's all dribbling and no passing. And he's less good there than out right too
 
Gutter Boy said:
I'm not sure that would suit him, considering how one-footed he is, and all he does is cut in (he's not a passer or a crosser).

Maybe it would mean Kudus being used in the 10? But again that's all dribbling and no passing. And he's less good there than out right too
Click to expand...
Totally agree. Cant see how this fits with any kind of plan. Unless like you say it means moving Kudus (as the priorities are CAM, Striker, LB.
 
Gutter Boy said:
I'm not sure about this. He's obviously a good player. But he's also very much a dribbling right winger. Quite similar to the one we bought for £60m a month ago. He's not much of a passer, and he's very one-footed. The balance just doesn't seem right with Kudus already here.
Click to expand...
He would walk into our side.
 
Can play either flank, unpredictable and tricky, 21 years old but with experience at a high level...
Suddenly having him and Kudus gives us great players to watch as they dribble and attack opponents.
All for this.
 
JerusalemMan said:
Can play either flank, unpredictable and tricky, 21 years old but with experience at a high level...
Suddenly having him and Kudus gives us great players to watch as they dribble and attack opponents.
All for this.
Click to expand...

No goals in either of them though. It would need a Clive Allen 87 forward to tie everything together. We'd also still need a 10 to be able to progress the ball to them.

Presumably it would mean Tel becoming a full-time CF/Richy's replacement?
 
Gutter Boy said:
No goals in either of them though. It would need a Clive Allen 87 forward to tie everything together. We'd also still need a 10 to be able to progress the ball to them.

Presumably it would mean Tel becoming a full-time CF/Richy's replacement?
Click to expand...
A system set up for Dom to receive crosses, passes, chances should see him be more than adequate for that role.
And if you've seen Savinho's goal against Juventus a couple of weeks ago, then he certainly has skill & technique to add more goals to his game. Again, he's 21. You cannot say 'there's no goals in him' at this stage of his career
 
An excellent player. Watching him last season had my thinking, " why dont we buy players like that". Then we bought Kudus who also prefers the right side apparently.
Id still take him though, but seems nonesense that City would want to sell him.
 
Gutter Boy said:
I'm not sure about this. He's obviously a good player. But he's also very much a dribbling right winger. Quite similar to the one we bought for £60m a month ago. He's not much of a passer, and he's very one-footed. The balance just doesn't seem right with Kudus already here.
Click to expand...

I have to wonder if we won't be looking to try Kudus more centrally in the 10 spot but perhapos not with Madders-like 10ism? If you were to play Kudus, Savinho, Johnson as a three behind Solanke - providing Savinho and Johnson play narrow - it could cause chaos. The interchange between them would be dizzying!
If you allow the FBs to overlap, let Paulinho drop in for security and have one of Bergy/Bentancur as the progressive pivot, well, it could be fun???? The main issue is connecting front to back of course...perhaps we'll look to the likes of not just Bergy/Bents but also Porro to push up and pass acurately????
 
thfcsteff said:
I have to wonder if we won't be looking to try Kudus more centrally in the 10 spot but perhapos not with Madders-like 10ism? If you were to play Kudus, Savinho, Johnson as a three behind Solanke - providing Savinho and Johnson play narrow - it could cause chaos. The interchange between them would be dizzying!
If you allow the FBs to overlap, let Paulinho drop in for security and have one of Bergy/Bentancur as the progressive pivot, well, it could be fun???? The main issue is connecting front to back of course...perhaps we'll look to the likes of not just Bergy/Bents but also Porro to push up and pass acurately????
Click to expand...

I could see it as move towards becoming a counter attacking side again. Break at speed with Savinho, Johnson, Odobert, Tel, Kudus etc. Not quite as much need for a Maddison-type in that setup. Not sure how that goes against Burnley, Leeds etc who setup with 10 players on the edge of their box for 90 minutes though.

And that sort of thing had Nuno hounded out within a few months.
 
thfcsteff said:
I have to wonder if we won't be looking to try Kudus more centrally in the 10 spot but perhapos not with Madders-like 10ism? If you were to play Kudus, Savinho, Johnson as a three behind Solanke - providing Savinho and Johnson play narrow - it could cause chaos. The interchange between them would be dizzying!
If you allow the FBs to overlap, let Paulinho drop in for security and have one of Bergy/Bentancur as the progressive pivot, well, it could be fun???? The main issue is connecting front to back of course...perhaps we'll look to the likes of not just Bergy/Bents but also Porro to push up and pass acurately????
Click to expand...

I'm not sure that would work so well, a second dribbler through the middle. I wonder if the plan might instead be to end up more something like?:

-‐‐------------------------Tel
Savinho----El Khannouss---Kudus

That's more balanced for me, and frighteningly exciting too. I have a hunch that a more rapid and aggressive AM trio would suit Tel more than Solanke, but obviously it would rely on Tel finding his shooting boots
 
tommysvr said:
I could see it as move towards becoming a counter attacking side again. Break at speed with Savinho, Johnson, Odobert, Tel, Kudus etc. Not quite as much need for a Maddison-type in that setup. Not sure how that goes against Burnley, Leeds etc who setup with 10 players on the edge of their box for 90 minutes though.

And that sort of thing had Nuno hounded out within a few months.
Click to expand...
Id fancy all of Savinho, Odobert and Kudus against a deep set defence. They've all got a trick and a bit of explosivity. Solanke's presence would be useful in that situation too. Tel and Johnson are more counter attacking specialists though
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back