Bishop
Les Ferdinand
We must have been on the Peroni all season.Last season, when we won the EL and played Brighton it wasn't the beach we were on. We were on the Peroni![]()
We must have been on the Peroni all season.Last season, when we won the EL and played Brighton it wasn't the beach we were on. We were on the Peroni![]()
We must have been on the Peroni all season.![]()
levy done a very poor job witt the thfc brand- esl, corporate espionage, 3x no transfer ins windows, highest paid chairman etc., paying for top coaches hoping for instant wins., spanking new facilities without the football to show for etc.
its easy for any neutral to hate thfc just following the headlines in the media
I’m not really a levy fan but from a brand Tottenham perspective he did a great job. Our clubs position in the “big club hierarchy” is lower than it should be due to Sugar not investing during the sports biggest boom period.
Both!Which one?
I wish I could have double liked this post.Your comment reminds me a bit of Woolworths, Blockbuster, Nokia, Blackberry etc. There would have been a time in their history where they were in denial about their brand as it "used to be amazing" and "our leader has done great things".
I think our club's brand is in the toilet personally and Levy's hands are all over it. We're the club most PL fans want relegated. We're the club significantly good players try to avoid, we're the club that nobody wants to transact with on transfers. I could keep going on but unless our leadership team address this (and the club culture) we will see more of the same.
Levy and the club's brand management has been horrible, especially post stadium launch. Levy's own public and personal brand has always been an issue. The club's goes through good and bad phases. We're in a bad phase right now.
Your comment reminds me a bit of Woolworths, Blockbuster, Nokia, Blackberry etc. There would have been a time in their history where they were in denial about their brand as it "used to be amazing" and "our leader has done great things".
I think our club's brand is in the toilet personally and Levy's hands are all over it. We're the club most PL fans want relegated. We're the club significantly good players try to avoid, we're the club that nobody wants to transact with on transfers. I could keep going on but unless our leadership team address this (and the club culture) we will see more of the same.
Levy and the club's brand management has been horrible, especially post stadium launch. Levy's own public and personal brand has always been an issue. The club's goes through good and bad phases. We're in a bad phase right now.
Your comment reminds me a bit of Woolworths, Blockbuster, Nokia, Blackberry etc. There would have been a time in their history where they were in denial about their brand as it "used to be amazing" and "our leader has done great things".
I think our club's brand is in the toilet personally and Levy's hands are all over it. We're the club most PL fans want relegated. We're the club significantly good players try to avoid, we're the club that nobody wants to transact with on transfers. I could keep going on but unless our leadership team address this (and the club culture) we will see more of the same.
Levy and the club's brand management has been horrible, especially post stadium launch. Levy's own public and personal brand has always been an issue. The club's goes through good and bad phases. We're in a bad phase right now.
I am sure that @90sSpursBook will touch on this in season 2.
94/95 we sign Klinsmann, Popescu and Dumitrescu. This combines with a group of young English players Sheringham, Barmby, Anderton, Walker. Had we kicked on with Carr & Judas coming through, a good CB & CM signing would have turned us into a really strong side.
But Klinsmann and Popescu leave the club within a season and Dumitrescu who flopped. Sugar has had his fingers burner by “Carlos Kick a ball” and doesn’t make a marquee continental signing until Rebrov in 2001.
At that point we are a significantly bigger club than Chelsea in every aspect. History, Trophies won, Media attention, Attendence, Revenue, Global reach.
Chelsea bring in Hoddle as manager. He brings in Guilit who eventually replaced him. They bring in a litany of foreign stars and the FA Cup, League Cup and Cup Winners Cup.
Abramovic is then in the market for a London Football club. He is advised that Chelsea’s squad is much closer to being top level than Spurs and the rest is history. (The flying over Stamford Bridge story is a myth)
What has us being the more desired club to be relegated got to do with Levy? Why would you expect the majority to want West Ham or Forest or whoever to be relegated ahead of us? Anyone takes pleasure in the demise of a big club, if it was Man U Chelsea or the Goons in our position the fan reaction would be exactly the same towards them.Your comment reminds me a bit of Woolworths, Blockbuster, Nokia, Blackberry etc. There would have been a time in their history where they were in denial about their brand as it "used to be amazing" and "our leader has done great things".
I think our club's brand is in the toilet personally and Levy's hands are all over it. We're the club most PL fans want relegated. We're the club significantly good players try to avoid, we're the club that nobody wants to transact with on transfers. I could keep going on but unless our leadership team address this (and the club culture) we will see more of the same.
Levy and the club's brand management has been horrible, especially post stadium launch. Levy's own public and personal brand has always been an issue. The club's goes through good and bad phases. We're in a bad phase right now.
Chelsea's success is same as City, tainted/cheating, any club can be successful by losing 1M+ a week for 18 years in a row. I for one am glad we had nothing to do with Russian ownership directly tied to Putin's regime (only so far my hypocrisy can go).
What has us being the more desired club to be relegated got to do with Levy? Why would you expect the majority to want West Ham or Forest or whoever to be relegated ahead of us? Anyone takes pleasure in the demise of a big club, if it was Man U Chelsea or the Goons in our position the fan reaction would be exactly the same towards them.
A big part of why we are hated is because we had the audacity to break into the top 4 and stay there. It was noticeable before it was nice harmless Tottenham playing pretty football, and once we became extremely competitive that perception towards us from rivals changed.
Honestly, Levy had plenty of failings but you're reaching somewhat trying to put that on him....
Chelsea's success is same as City, tainted/cheating, any club can be successful by losing 1M+ a week for 18 years in a row. I for one am glad we had nothing to do with Russian ownership directly tied to Putin's regime (only so far my hypocrisy can go).
I'd recommend you re-visit our history, fundamentally we had major financial problems plus the transition to PL/CL changed the way top clubs were paid that deeply affected Spurs. Summary we went from a % model to the Sky 4 reward model, that gave the clubs that happened to be at the top of table (not us) a headstart that only Spurs has managed to even close the gap on.
chels
Chelsea had already overtaken us before the Russian money. Regularly in the top 4, signing top level players and winning trophies.
By 94/95 we were past those issues. Had the club kept Klinsmann, Popescu, Barmby would would have been in a great position. Add a good CB alongside Judus, someone like Southgate went that summer for good fee and another midfielder to play with Popescu we would have had a really good side.
chels
Chelsea had already overtaken us before the Russian money. Regularly in the top 4, signing top level players and winning trophies.
By 94/95 we were past those issues. Had the club kept Klinsmann, Popescu, Barmby would would have been in a great position. Add a good CB alongside Judus, someone like Southgate went that summer for good fee and another midfielder to play with Popescu we would have had a really good side.
I am sure that @90sSpursBook will touch on this in season 2.
94/95 we sign Klinsmann, Popescu and Dumitrescu. This combines with a group of young English players Sheringham, Barmby, Anderton, Walker. Had we kicked on with Carr & Judas coming through, a good CB & CM signing would have turned us into a really strong side.
But Klinsmann and Popescu leave the club within a season and Dumitrescu who flopped. Sugar has had his fingers burner by “Carlos Kick a ball” and doesn’t make a marquee continental signing until Rebrov in 2001.
At that point we are a significantly bigger club than Chelsea in every aspect. History, Trophies won, Media attention, Attendence, Revenue, Global reach.
Chelsea bring in Hoddle as manager. He brings in Guilit who eventually replaced him. They bring in a litany of foreign stars and the FA Cup, League Cup and Cup Winners Cup.
Abramovic is then in the market for a London Football club. He is advised that Chelsea’s squad is much closer to being top level than Spurs and the rest is history. (The flying over Stamford Bridge story is a myth)
Yeh I think there are some dates being mixed in this thread. 2023 off my head is when Roman came in, so 8/9 years after Klinsmann and Co and only a season or so after Levy and CoWasn't it more that ENIC had bought out Sugar only a year before that and weren't thought to be likely to sell at a reasonable price? May have my timelines confused but don't think we were on the market in the same way that bankrupt Ken Bates has Chelsea.
Also didn't we sign foreigners such as Ginola, Saib, Iversen, Berti, Freund, Vega, Neilsen etc in the post Klinsmann era? Maybe not marquee but it hardly suggested that Sugar's anti-Klinsmann rant actually limited our shopping - perhaps more that we have always had poorer scouts?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.