Rossi22
Pedro Mendes
Didn't think it was especially powerful.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Rating v Man C
- Thread starter Mulletperm
- Start date
Didn't think it was especially powerful.
africanspurs
Justin Edinburgh
Last edited:
Naughton16
Clive Wilson
Sounds silly now but I really had high hope for Dempsey to make an impact today.
africanspurs
Justin Edinburgh
this makes 6
So he gets sent of and we play with 10 men instead of the 9 we were playing with as Defoe and Dempsey clearly weren't there
Spursalot
Jimmy McCormick
Exactly. And as far as i am aware playing with 9 men would be worse than playing with 10.
I am glad you agree.
Rossi22
Pedro Mendes
Agree with this, when you're under the cosh you don't bring on a player like Defoe. Starting 11 was ok, only sub that needed to be made was probably Sigurdsson for Dempsey.
Yes that`s wy we lost, Ade of and Defoe on. For that Ade would have marked Dezko when he scored his goal???
seaside spur
Ronnie Rosenthal
I would normallly agree but i thought the chance of a counter attack and another goal was on. City were going for the winner and the game was open.
Dempsey off for Defoe was so obvious, with Ade dropping onto Dempseys role, who's better, Ade or Dempsey?
Who is more likey to get as ogoal? Defoe or Ade? It's not rocket science.
Very disappointed with all of AVB's sub, worst subs i have ever seen.
Cost us any chance of winning the game and did nothing to prevent us losing it.
Dempsey off for Defoe was so obvious, with Ade dropping onto Dempseys role, who's better, Ade or Dempsey?
Who is more likey to get as ogoal? Defoe or Ade? It's not rocket science.
Very disappointed with all of AVB's sub, worst subs i have ever seen.
Cost us any chance of winning the game and did nothing to prevent us losing it.
I really do not understand why everyone is complaining about the change?
Walker injured = should he have continued to play hurt?
Lonnon of = no difference that I noticed after the change?
I can agree that Demsey against Defoe would have been better!
But we were completely out played the entire second half, we were maybe 5 minutes in their half of the field in the last 45 minutes!
Rossi22
Pedro Mendes
If you're under pressure then you either need players who can keep the ball or an outlet upfront to at least hold it up for a while, Defoe does neither of these so it was a strange sub to make.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Thought it was a decent performance against a team who are clearly much better than us. Remember Redknapp lost 5-1 at home to them last season with Modric, vdV, Kaboul and BAE in the side
PochettinoPochettinoPochettino
Serge Aurier
A collective 11.
Kingdawson
Banned
Mate we played Modric and Niko fudging Kranjcar in the centre.
Yes i se that, but we were under pressure for 45 minutes, it was not like the pressure started when AVB made that change, or?
ANd i agree, i would have taken of Demp`s to, but i dont think it was the big tipping point.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Is that weaker than Sandro and Huddlestone (who was on the bench behind Kranjcar)?
No way we had the quality of players today to compete with Silva.
braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
I agree, but also remember that Adebayor has been out injured, played Thursday and now again today, if he was tiring (seems likely) then bringing on some fresh legs in Defoe makes a lot of sense.
