DeanoAustin
Jimmy McCormick
We may have scored more than our opposition at times, but being managed by a halfwit is always a loss.
Isn't describing Tactics Tim as a halfwit sort of overestimating him by 50%?
We may have scored more than our opposition at times, but being managed by a halfwit is always a loss.
It was the right time to move AVB on when it happened IMO. I liked the guy at the start but the sheen wore off.I’d have to do some maths but iirc correctly AVB’s record was ok, he was fired for falling out with others at the club and the two embarrassing defeats to city and liverpool.
We’d stormed the EL group and got to the LC qf’s.
I believe that at the time he was fired we had more points from fixtures played than we had accrued in the previous season (which was a club record points tally)
Levy clearly lost faith in AVB and couldn’t see him continuing our trajectory.
He's the only appointment made in my time supporting the club where I couldn't see any reason or logic behind it, there are many it didn't work out for but at least they had shown something elsewhere.
It was one of Levy's few mistakes, although it pays testament to what Levy has done with that club that even an ignoramus like sherwood couldn't do to much damage.
As much as AVB’ s fans would hate to admit it, the appointment of AVB ultimately made our club a laughing stock far more than any thing Sherwood did. Chelsea fans were laughing because they knew how it would end for us having suffered first hand from his methods and failings. The press were laughing because he was falling apart in front of their eyes. Everyone could say “I told you so, ” when it inevitably went tits up as they had predicted.
For all his failings at least Sherwood steadied the ship and allowed us to wait until the summer to appoint Poch. In addition AVB has not missed any opportunity to criticise both Abramovich and Levy since his departure from their clubs. In the case of the latter he did so while failing to acknowledge his own failings. Personally I feel far more antipathy towards AVB than Sherwood.
And that was with the benefit of AVB's good work.I am not sure where those who are saying Sherwood had a better win ratio then AVB, according to the list below AVB had a 55%win against Sherwood 50% ????
Manager Years Played Won Win %
1 Frank Brettell 1898–1899 63 37 58.73
2 Arthur Turner 1942–1946 49 27 55.10
3 André Villas-Boas 2012–2013 80 44 55.00
4 Mauricio Pochettino 2014– 180 99 55
5 John Cameron 1899–1907 570 296 51.93
6 David Pleat 1 1986–1987 119 60 50.42
7 Tim Sherwood 2013–2014 28 14 50.00
8 Harry Redknapp 2008–2012 198 98 49.49
I am not sure where those who are saying Sherwood had a better win ratio then AVB, according to the list below AVB had a 55%win against Sherwood 50% ????
Manager Years Played Won Win %
1 Frank Brettell 1898–1899 63 37 58.73
2 Arthur Turner 1942–1946 49 27 55.10
3 André Villas-Boas 2012–2013 80 44 55.00
4 Mauricio Pochettino 2014– 180 99 55
5 John Cameron 1899–1907 570 296 51.93
6 David Pleat 1 1986–1987 119 60 50.42
7 Tim Sherwood 2013–2014 28 14 50.00
8 Harry Redknapp 2008–2012 198 98 49.49
And that was with the benefit of AVB's good work.
Timmeh would be lucky to get a 20% win ratio if he had to start from "shuffle across a bit"
I think the players just needed the break from AVB's style and it happened to be Sherwood who provided it for them -- he gave them freedom to express themselves, which in hindsight was down to him not having a clue how to do anything else. They did that, relaxed, scored goals and won games. Levy knew that was all it was (I didn't to be fair, I thought he might be given a chance as his record was pretty good, glad that didn't happen!) and he got rid of him and got Poch -- best thing the club has done in my time supporting Spurs.
Good point, that was the third defeat under AVB that season, they were the only three though. Also it’s west ham, they always turn up against us, City and liverpool spanked us under sherwood in the reverse fixtures too iirc.
He had a system he was determined to employ, he’d done the same the previous season which worked, when we won games under AVB you could see why, there was a framework, a very very similar framework to that which Poch employs now, admittedly with a much stronger squad.
On your last point, I think it’s a crime that they are talked about so similarly or that anyone could consider sherwood an upgrade, AVB is a qualified and knowledgeable coach with a clear understanding of the game and ideas on how to exploit the opposition, sherwood is a fudging macaron with no qualifications, however you feel about AVB, he was certainly qualified to take the job, sherwood wasn’t even close.
I don't begrudge a coach having a preferred method of playing or gameplan, but have some fudging different ideas as well and tailor/adapt them when needed depending on the oppisition you are up against, for example, don't play a suicidal high line at home to a pacey Liverpool attacking unit with Michael Dawson playing at the heart of the defence who isn't renowned for his pace.
It's amazing how two people could have such a different interpretation of a coach's style of play/tactics. I barely see any similarity between AVB and Poch, in fact, I'd say it does Poch a huge disservice. Even during AVB's first, more succesful season, we looked bereft of ideas going forward and didn't look like scoring until Gareth Bale steps forward and scores another screamer out of nothing. I truly wonder if we have ever scored as many goals from outside the box as we did that season. I accept that Poch has a more talented squad than AVB had but we create far more chances and look more dangerous going forward and don't rely on dominating possession to win games. Three great examples of this were Liverpool, Dortmund and Real Madrid this season when Poch wasn't too bothered about conceding the majority of possession to the opposition as this meant we could hit them on the break. More importantly, we are 400% better defensively. We play a high line but that is where the similarities end. We are now well drilled and better positionally individually and as a unit.
I think AVB COULD become a top coach if he learned to become less stubborn with his tactical approach. It appears that he also has a tendency to rub people the wrong way so perhaps he could improve his people skills.
I think the players just needed the break from AVB's style and it happened to be Sherwood who provided it for them -- he gave them freedom to express themselves, which in hindsight was down to him not having a clue how to do anything else. They did that, relaxed, scored goals and won games. Levy knew that was all it was (I didn't to be fair, I thought he might be given a chance as his record was pretty good, glad that didn't happen!) and he got rid of him and got Poch -- best thing the club has done in my time supporting Spurs.
Massively glad we got rid of him and got poch as well. I think he is unfairly vilified on here. But fudge me am I glad we got rid of him and got poch.
Absolutely this.For the most part, it's AVB's fans that vilify Sherwood. To some, AVB is their SAF. Whoever replaced him was going to get short shrift, the fact that it was Sherwood who admittedly is a bit of a joker made that transition exponentially worse.