milo
Jack L. Jones
I honestly think if i was made a mod and then created a coup and ran the whole site no matters like this would come up.
You are obviously right but this site would probably take a slightly different direction
I honestly think if i was made a mod and then created a coup and ran the whole site no matters like this would come up.
FFS how about the mods answering the questions raised by the proles rather than chatting among themselves?
It's a discussion.
They are discussing it in the open so everyone can see how they feel about it.
Makes perfect sense really.
You are obviously right but this site would probably take a slightly different direction
This is a chat site. Nobody dies from what is said on here or if they put a post in the wrong place. It has crashed many times and all the posts have been lost. So fudging what?
Swerving? How about answering the points raised by the posters in this thread?
And rude? I suggest you look at your reply in the Defoe thread which you merged.
Absolutely abhor it. Was a time you'd come on here every day be greeted by at least dozen new topics, half of which were sure to get your juices flowing.
Nowadays this place is about as exciting as the shopping channel.
This response maybe a little antangonistic but to be honest it seems very true. This poll has 70% of responders (i'm not worthy enough to vote by the way for some reason) clicking the "this is broken" option. I would have thought there would have been more interest in a discussion on how to improve the site rather than just closing ranks with responses like "don't blame the mods". It's not about that!!
As I said earlier, how about an open discussion on trying to get the balance right? The evidence appears to be that casual users are feeling alienated. It really feels like a closed shop here. I even have to wait for a mod to read my post before it's allowed to be published on the site!!
#overcontrolled
This response maybe a little antangonistic but to be honest it seems very true. This poll has 70% of responders (i'm not worthy enough to vote by the way for some reason) clicking the "this is broken" option. I would have thought there would have been more interest in a discussion on how to improve the site rather than just closing ranks with responses like "don't blame the mods". It's not about that!!
As I said earlier, how about an open discussion on trying to get the balance right? The evidence appears to be that casual users are feeling alienated. It really feels like a closed shop here. I even have to wait for a mod to read my post before it's allowed to be published on the site!!
#overcontrolled
You don't think the numbers in the poll are even slightly influenced by the wording of the alternatives?
I think, if you leave a new thread to run for a while, and eventually merge it into another larger thread, the posts seperate into date/time order, therefore posts from the newer thread (assuming the larger one was still active) would be mixed in and no longer make sense as they would not be answering the relevant posts.
As I say, I THINK that is what happens.
Or you could just continue to post inane drivel in this thread until people get bored of asking
Yes, but that happens when the thread is merged anyway and is what people find difficult with the mega-threads.
Immediate merging makes live discussion difficult. A dominant topic will make it difficult to follow other things in the thread. Keeping the more topical things separate while live discussion is ongoing allows other topics to continue in the main thread.
While merging later will also mix it up, its more an archive feature for people who only come on the site occasionally. They might appreciate having everything in one place rather than checking several index pages for threads.
So it strikes me that keeping new threads separate while they are active, while people are having a discussion in more or less real time, helps keep separate discussions ongoing. Then merging when the discussion slows down helps keep things tidy and easier for people who come on occasionally. This way would benefit both regular users and more sporadic users.
You're lucky he even game the middle option FFS
without it, it would be a landslide
Open your eyes mods. About 1 in 8 think the system is working
Or you could just continue to post inane drivel in this thread until people get bored of asking
It's important we all get the forum we want. Scara has made this platform for us and the amount of time we spend on it is testament to him and his hard work. As has been mentioned none of us are paid to do this. We just want to post about Spurs and talk to other Spurs fans. We've got no other agenda other than choosing to help Scara make this a more manageable place to run.
Ultimately the success of the forum is down to the people who post on it. Good posters make a good forum, and unfortunately and somewhat ironically I find those that are most vocal in telling everyone that the forum is brick are often the ones who make it less usable and engaging for others.
We're all on the same page, lets not make it a whole "them" and "us" thing, we're all Spurs fans (and Greg).
Again, we're happy to listen to what works and what doesn't to improve it. Most of the older posters that have been around way before me are very much the reason I joined up in the first place.