StephenH
David Ginola
Those needing help could have it provided far more sustainably if debt interest payments were lower.
yes Theresa!
Or ATM not at all!
Austerity is only affordable by those who don’t notice it!
Last edited:
Those needing help could have it provided far more sustainably if debt interest payments were lower.
yes Theresa!
Or ATM not at all!
Austerity is only affordable by those who don’t notice it!
This lot are trying to start their term by bankrupting us
The country has to do well so that we can afford to pay for those who need it.You have to comfortably off to worry about a thing like the national debt.
We should all care more about the elderly and those needing help.
Interesting.
Spending more than you can afford to is the usual route.Interesting.
These happen rarely happen overnight.
Perhaps something to do with more management and lack of foresight previously?
Short-term thinking is a surefire path to bankruptcy.
Spending incorrectly and diverting funds, thus increasing the costs for the next person might just do it to.Spending more than you can afford to is the usual route.
Someone somewhere in the world that you could have saved by spending a bit more will die every day, probably every minute.Spending incorrectly and diverting funds, thus increasing the costs for the next person might just do it to.
You can't run public services like household or business finance unless you are prepared for people to suffer or die.
Some people are ok with that position.
I'm not.
Spending more than you can afford to is the usual route.
If I spent more than I could afford I'd be using one pretty quickly - that's kind of my point.When did you have to use a food bank?
Your logic is easy to sprout when you have more than enough money!
If I spent more than I could afford I'd be using one pretty quickly - that's kind of my point.
I wasn't, I was pointing out that if the government overspends now then it can't help anyone tomorrow when it's skint.Yes but you have never had to choose who eats in your family, you or your kids!
Pontificating about good housekeeping presupposes you have the luxury of choice.
I wasn't, I was pointing out that if the government overspends now then it can't help anyone tomorrow when it's skint.
We all want the government to help those who need it - Labour don't seem to realise that if they kill the golden goose, it stops laying eggs.
I think that's a caricature that bears little resemblance to reality.But the conservatives just don’t bother to help because of their ideologies and fiscal ingrained priorities towards big business.
We need to change the government’s priorities back to people and away from purely balancing the books.
I think that's a caricature that bears little resemblance to reality.
We need to change the government’s priorities back to people and away from purely balancing the books.
But the books aren't being balanced, which tends to detract from your argument a little.
Debt interest represented the government's 5th highest expenditure category in 2017 according to wikipedia, higher than categories such as public order (I assume that means policing), social services, and housing. That's before all the promised additional borrowing kicks in.
I’m talking about real people and truly don’t give a toss about the debate!
My 85 yo step dad has been lying in A&E for the last 8 hours waiting for a bed on a ward to come free at the Princess Royal Hayward’s Heath. This is the real world not ideological banter!