ringo
Tim Sherwood
That's absolutely not true.
In any negotiation, both parties will be trying to get what's best for them. It doesn't matter whether no deal is worse for the UK or not, the EU doesn't want it, and will have to make an offer to stop it happening.
I agree that both parties will be trying to get what is best for them. But I'm arguing that the EU may well believe that, on balance, the impact of the alternative - the deal that the UK government is willing to accept - is worse than no-deal- because it destabilises the EU to the degree that it could lead to the destruction of the EU project, for example. And therefore is willing to tolerate or mitigate the impact of a no-deal. In which case no-deal is ineffective as leverage.