Why were previous managers (especially Hoddle, Jol and Redknapp) not allowed to have injuries as an excuse for poor performances but now it's acceptable under a different manager? What's changed?
We should have a 45 minute punch up just for the fun of it.
In all seriousness - we were also fourth last season but playing much better football etc. When I say 45 minute i mean playing well. The other 45 we do not. Chelscum last week. Today. QPR at home. To name three games.
You do not get into 4th position in this league as a 45 minute team.
We should have a 45 minute punch up just for the fun of it.
In all seriousness - we were also fourth last season but playing much better football etc. When I say 45 minute i mean playing well. The other 45 we do not. Chelscum last week. Today. QPR at home. To name three games.[/B]
We're missing Kaboul, BAE, Parker, Dembele and Ade. That's a bench full of quality right there.
Kaboul, King, Ekotto, Parker, Modric, VDV, Adebayor
=D> as always matey, you bring things into perspective and showcase why we are doing very well considering we've had an overhaul.
Yes. There is plenty that can be improved all round. But we are fourth when we have be slagged down at every quarter because we are a team in transition, we have lost exceptional players and we need a couple of the new players to gel.
I'm not saying we are challenging for the league by any means. But for fudges sake, we are doing something right to be the fourth best performing team in the country in spite of the above.
Kaboul, King, Ekotto, Parker, Modric, VDV, Adebayor
Eh? if the EXACT same thing has happened 3 other times and has happened 4 out of 4 times then it must not be about the players playing midweek.
Personally i think it's about the closing down tactic that you simply can't maintain for a full 90 mins.
True but then the issue about why are we buying brick players comes up... 14m on sig and dempsey is a bit of a joke when what we needed was creativity. It brings up a whole new debate
On the money.
i think some of the comments in this thread are embarrassing TBH...
Actually no, I thought Harry had taken us as far as he could and under achieved with us last season.
It's a match thread, people will always make unreasoned comments, vent a little, based on whatever they're seeing right now. It's part of the fun.
Was there one person on here who thought buying Siggy was a bad idea?
I seem to remember it was pretty unanimous that we had a bargain.
14 million is a steal for 2 quality prem players.
I didnt think it was a bad idea I thought it was a fudgein joke of a signing. But people had a go at me so thought id give the guy some time. I thought he was a MOTD player and wasnt sure why we spent 8m - wasnt this before AVB was even brought in?
Its not about whether I was right or not though or anyone its about buying good players and if AVB brought those players then we cant bring up the past players as an excuse that our performances lack creativity etc. If Levy brought those players then well... thats not backing a manager. Anyways its a whole new debate im sure.