• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

***OMT: Tottenham Hotspur vs. Fulham *** Sunday, December 1, 1:30 pm UK

If a manager can only succeed (finish top 4 lol) with elite players and two per position somethings not right - poor excuse that. What happened to managers who could make their teams greater than the sum of their parts?

Who were the last managers who could do that?

This was my issue with people like Mourinho and Conte - 'world class' managers but only if they had exactly the squad they wanted and lots of money to spend.
 
You've taken my observation out of context. I clearly said I believe that due to the toll too much football is taking on players (and their health), you need two elite (to the system) players per position. Our injuries tell you the story.
Nobody is taking it out of context, you literally said that you need to elite players per position to finish 4th/5th. We've done that multiple times and have never had 2 elite players per position, we've rarely had 1 per position never mind 2.
 
We didn't get the rub of the green, we were decimated by injuries last year. Brighton are in with a good chance of 5th, do they have 2 elite players per position?
I meant winning games in last minutes etc. Something that isn't happening that often this season!
As for Bton and Forest. It helps that we, villa, and Saudi Sportswashing Machine, utd are having a mare
 
So we had that last year when finishing 5th and Villa had it as well when finishing 4th?
Saudi Sportswashing Machine had it the year before that when finishing top 4?
You don't need two elite players per position, very few do. If you have that you are fighting for the league.
Nobody has two elite players for every position. Even City don't. Look at how they've fallen off a cliff since Rodri was injured. If you're them you can't buy another Rodri and expect them to be happy waiting for their chance from the bench. Same with Haaland, thet had to let Alvarez go in the summer because he wasnt willing to play second fiddle. They've also missed his goals this season. You'll never manage a squad where you don't have a drop off due to injuries/fixture congestion.
 
No doubt. But any team seriously chasing European qualification has surely got to be looking for more than 2 points from that combination of games.
Are we seriously chasing European qualification? I've said from the early games we will finish about 10th (maybe 1 or 2 higher, maybe 1 or 2 lower). Nothing I've seen since makes me change my mind, although the clear ability to give very good teams a hiding does make our complete inability to be consistent more infuriating than it should be.
 
You've taken my observation out of context. I clearly said I believe that due to the toll too much football is taking on players (and their health), you need two elite (to the system) players per position. Our injuries tell you the story.
I think this is a very good point if I understand you correctly.

We need a squad of players that all fit the system well and are ready to do a good job in that system.

Mostly our strongest 11 does that (I have some question marks about the fit to the system for Son as well as Bissouma and Bentancur). We have strengthened our squad too in that regard, but still not at the point where we have the options we need. But we have players that can develop into becoming those players in quite a few positions.
 
Are we seriously chasing European qualification? I've said from the early games we will finish about 10th (maybe 1 or 2 higher, maybe 1 or 2 lower). Nothing I've seen since makes me change my mind, although the clear ability to give very good teams a hiding does make our complete inability to be consistent more infuriating than it should be.
Given the money spent, and the general expectations of the board, I'd say we are absolutely chasing European qualification. In fact, I'd say it's the current raison d'etre of the club.

If Ange doesn't achieve it this season then I think he'll be gone - and I wouldn't rule out the trigger being pulled with a couple of months of the season to go if it looks like a new manager might give a lift to get us into the top 6, if we're not already there.
 
What is the common factor with successful teams, and why do they win?

Oh, right! They have the best players and best squads! If you manage to win the league without a great squad, it's called luck (Leicester City). To be at the top and challenge consistently, you need a great squad, a good mamanger, good coaches etc. It's the combined sum of everything that makes successful teams successful.

We're talking about our immediate goals, not winning the league - that's obviously what we need to be working towards wrt squad building, but in the interim we should be able to progress and be competitive still
 
I'm not a Daniel fanboy but Kane wanted out Levy stopped him going to city but couldn't stop him going to Bayern. It was Kane who decided to leave
As for the worst chairman/owner I give you scholar who nearly sent us to the wall. Sugar was another failure. Levy isn't even close to being as bad as those two

I think Kane would have stayed if certain promises given to him were kept. For instance building a team that was a serious prospect at challenging for honours.

He had a handshake deal with Levy and Levy lied to him. Simple as that. It's no wonder he left as soon as he could and the fact that he went to Munich shows what a class act he is and the respect he still has for the fans. In football terms it's nothing short of criminal to lose a generational talent such as Kane.
 
I think Kane would have stayed if certain promises given to him were kept. For instance building a team that was a serious prospect at challenging for honours.

He had a handshake deal with Levy and Levy lied to him. Simple as that. It's no wonder he left as soon as he could and the fact that he went to Munich shows what a class act he is and the respect he still has for the fans. In football terms it's nothing short of criminal to lose a generational talent such as Kane.
What handshake deal?

It's very hard to keep a player his entire career. We had Harry for his best years and lost him abroad for a decent fee. That means Levy did pretty well for the club in my book.
 
What handshake deal?

It's very hard to keep a player his entire career. We had Harry for his best years and lost him abroad for a decent fee. That means Levy did pretty well for the club in my book.



It was naïve at best of Kane to trust Levy but he was sold a pup. Levy just lies to everyone. Mainly us tbf.
 


It was naïve at best of Kane to trust Levy but he was sold a pup. Levy just lies to everyone. Mainly us tbf.
So you've one side of the story and you're condemning Levy for holding Kane to his contract and then damning him for letting Kane go.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
 
I think Kane would have stayed if certain promises given to him were kept. For instance building a team that was a serious prospect at challenging for honours.

He had a handshake deal with Levy and Levy lied to him. Simple as that. It's no wonder he left as soon as he could and the fact that he went to Munich shows what a class act he is and the respect he still has for the fans. In football terms it's nothing short of criminal to lose a generational talent such as Kane.
Kane would have gone to city a year earlier if they had coughed up 100 mill. He went to Bayern because the met the asking price.

If utd or city had met the 80 million asking price he would have left for them instead of Bayern he didn't go to Bayern for us fans
 
Last edited:
Kane imo stayed a lot longer than he would have done pre Levy or early on under Levy.

From the one who shall not be named to Sheringham, Berbatov, Bale and Modric. Our best players have been leaving us sooner or later because we're not an elite club.

It's definitely not all thanks to Levy that Kane stayed as long as he did, but had we not developed as a club as we've done under Levy I think Kane would have left earlier.

Kane is mostly a success story for the club. The next step is making the next success story even more successful.
 
So you've one side of the story and you're condemning Levy for holding Kane to his contract and then damning him for letting Kane go.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.


I think the larger point is actually backing a genuinely world class, once in a generation player. Have the guts to back a manager and a player.

But he didn't. He hired 3 managers who were useless for the club and bought absolute garbage. It's not a surprise a player who wants to win things leaves Tottenham.
 
Back