We played okay, but every chance against is a goal and we need five shots to score.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
*** OMT Tottenham Hotspur v Luton Town FC ***
- Thread starter markysimmo
- Start date
We played okay, but every chance against is a goal and we need five shots to score.
Saw the highlights. Sounds right.
K.D.D.D.D.Soc
Ian Walker
I don't think I've ever seen a game where our opponents no9 spent more time in their box than ours. It's a bonus to have a manager who will pull top players when they're not performing, the substitutes helped improve the performance. Not a great display but their goal lead a charmed life at time and Porro was fouled for their goal, he may not have prevented it was a clear foul. Loved the way the pathetic protesters quicky turned round when we had an attack.
Jurgen the German
Erik Thorstvedt
Not a vintage performance and yet still could and should have scored 4 or 5 goals. Gotta stop gifting teams goals.
Robbo
Paul Walsh
Second game at our new home, and my first win - also a 100 percent win ratio for my seven year old who attended his first match today!
It was, as so many times this season, a frustrating watch with sloppy defending and wasteful finishing, with a sprinkle of small margins going the wrong way. Thoroughly deserved win in the end, but again many question marks.
We don't look anywhere near the finished article, with several key players underperforming/playing poorly. I'm not overly worried, but would like us to be more decisive and determined in front of both goals on a consistent basis. This whole poor first half, good second half business is getting tireing.
But hey; three points, a sunny afternoon on East upper and a happy kid - can't really complain. COYS!
PS: I've only made it to two games in the last nine years, so this might be an old debate, but what’s with the disco vibe at the stadium? I can’t remember there ever being as much and as loud music before and after the game, and during the break, as it was today. It seems so forced, and was a bit annoying IMO. Made it hard to talk and detached me a bit from the atmosphere. Then again, might just be me getting older and grumpier.
It was, as so many times this season, a frustrating watch with sloppy defending and wasteful finishing, with a sprinkle of small margins going the wrong way. Thoroughly deserved win in the end, but again many question marks.
We don't look anywhere near the finished article, with several key players underperforming/playing poorly. I'm not overly worried, but would like us to be more decisive and determined in front of both goals on a consistent basis. This whole poor first half, good second half business is getting tireing.
But hey; three points, a sunny afternoon on East upper and a happy kid - can't really complain. COYS!
PS: I've only made it to two games in the last nine years, so this might be an old debate, but what’s with the disco vibe at the stadium? I can’t remember there ever being as much and as loud music before and after the game, and during the break, as it was today. It seems so forced, and was a bit annoying IMO. Made it hard to talk and detached me a bit from the atmosphere. Then again, might just be me getting older and grumpier.
Bullet
Andy Thompson
Luton feigned injury multiple times. Especially Andros Townsend. Any touch and they threw themselves to the floor, and the ref whistled.
A very frustrating game. Werner can do everything except shoot. Maybe we should play him in goal?
clownfoot
Goran Bunjevcevic
Never felt worried today despite going behind early, just had an inevitability to us coming back even though we weren’t at our best.
I do worry that some players aren’t performing as well as they could be and in some cases it’s been happening for a while. One player in particular is Kulusevski. I could never question his commitment as he never stops running, but personally I don’t think he’s an Ange type winger. He likes his wingers to stay wide and get to the byline, and Kulusevski being left footed naturally cuts in from the right. While Maddison was injured I think he played a well at times in the middle and wouldn’t be against him getting a go there again
I do worry that some players aren’t performing as well as they could be and in some cases it’s been happening for a while. One player in particular is Kulusevski. I could never question his commitment as he never stops running, but personally I don’t think he’s an Ange type winger. He likes his wingers to stay wide and get to the byline, and Kulusevski being left footed naturally cuts in from the right. While Maddison was injured I think he played a well at times in the middle and wouldn’t be against him getting a go there again
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
9 fake Luton injuries up until we scored our 2nd
Then an Easter miracle happened and there was no more until the final whistle
Their constant cheating and timewasting did them no good
Then an Easter miracle happened and there was no more until the final whistle
Their constant cheating and timewasting did them no good
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
"Managed Fun" has slowly been creeping over from america for years. Giant foam fingers and having to play imaginary bongos when the camera lands on you is coming next season.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
It seems to go down well with the 'new coke head movement' chaps too
Hotshot-Tottenham
Edgar Davids
Just a bit of fun and I know it’s immaterial now, and I understand about angles and perspective, butttttt look how deep in the goal the ball *appears* to be from this still.
Looks like the graphic could be a few frames later, maybe after the foot has made contact??
Could they have screwed this up or have I gone all conspiracy-theory?
Image added:
Looks like the graphic could be a few frames later, maybe after the foot has made contact??
Could they have screwed this up or have I gone all conspiracy-theory?
Image added:
Attachments
tommysvr
Vedran Corluka
No offence to the random bloke with a dodgy screenshot, but I think I'll go with Hawkeye on this one.
Kandi1977
Garth Crooks
Hawk eye uses high speed cameras, not regular cameras. It's accurate to the millimetre. Also, it's irrelevant. The game has decided to use that technology to decide if the ball is over the line or not, so whatever margin of error it has, will go both ways, and the result is what it is, and has to be accepted.
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
Legohamster
Ian Walker
Hawkeye has been wrong once in however many years it's been in place, that's because they forgot to turn it on
It wasn't over the line
Jurgen the German
Erik Thorstvedt
Yeah I was convinced it was in during real time and in replays but the Hawkeye angle shows there isn’t clear daylight between the line and the ball. Bloody close but it’s not over the line.
Chrissivad
Dean Austin
Lifetime ban!
Regarding the ball over the line, that's one bit of tech I think works. So if the ref didn't get the alert on his watch, and the image shows it wasn't all over, than I trust that call.