I'll be as clear as I can with regards to my thoughts.
He needs time to rebuild, he needs two to three more windows IF we are going to continue with him.
When people like me knock the club for not giving him everything he needs, I'll add context. Ange does not ask for the same shedload of players and profiles a Mourinho or Conte would want, he does (however) want specific players for specific roles. I was excited when he 'won' the battle to sign VdV over Tapsoba (our football directorship wanted Tapsoba, Ange insisted on VdV for his pace and having a left-foot). Since then, we've had Johnson and Solanke as key position acquisitions. Who else? We have great young talent in Archie Gray, but right now, he is unable to develop in his best positions because we never adequetely addressed our FB or LCB squad issues. We appear to have told Ange to make Spence work, but for whatever reason Ange doesn't want to. If VdV isn't fit for Sunday, we may well have to play Gray at LCB again, which is absurd. I could go on.
Me? I'd give him the time.
But let's be honest, if we get thwacked on Sunday, the drums will be loud and the howling incessant. Levy can point to Munn as the reason Ange is here. And if he wants to appease whingers who don't want Ange, he will swoop in and make a change. I hope I'm wrong, because we've invested an awful lot of time and energy implementing the structure we have right now, and IMO, to change it would be so foolish. However, IF we want him to be successful, we have to blend the approach with regards to recruitment.
Now if you DON'T rate him as a manager/don't like what he is doing, I understand your frustration, but again, who do you blame for his appointment? Him? Of course not...anyway, a discussion I'm sure will be rolling around these parts for a while sadly...