• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

***OMT Spurs vs Leipzig***

Man of the match

  • Total voters
    41
  • Poll closed .
Glenda's Legs said:
So now we know where the blame liles. It's not Jose. It's not Levy. Not even the Poch legacy

https://twitter.com/x/status/1237696954097950720
Click to expand...

I was genuinely wondering last night what Moura was thinking about GHod's role in the result. Just can't fathom how anyone could think GHod was playing a role in an individual or team's sporting performance, and how anyone could continue thinking that when they lose. Bizarre.
 
elltrev said:
I was genuinely wondering last night what Moura was thinking about GHod's role in the result. Just can't fathom how anyone could think GHod was playing a role in an individual or team's sporting performance, and how anyone could continue thinking that when they lose. Bizarre.
Click to expand...
Atheist
 
fernadez said:
Just cause you say something doesn't make it true, where's the proof he was ignored and taken for granted. I don't call taking one of the best starting 11's in the league to the league positions we for performing miracles. Above expectations yeah, but at the time we were flying we had the best team in the country.

How can everything good be because of Poch, but everything bad nothing to do with him? I love the guy but he made mistakes as everyone does. The hard times now are a direct result of the hard times then and the good times before that, not removed from them.
Click to expand...

You're right. Or you would be if I was making stuff up and pulling it out of my arse. But I'm not sadly.

The fact you have pot-boiled this "discussion" down to "how can everything good be because of Poch but everything bad nothing to do with him" - IMO trying to suggest that is my view- says it all. I have expressed where I think he could've improved. I won't any further...

If that is what you, and others, see in what I am saying then it is best I just stay quiet in the future.
 
90291Spur said:
I heard on a podcast today that at least 5 of the Leipzig starters had been signed for not much money by their scout Paul Mitchell. If only we had someone like him to procure talent on a budget. Oh, wait, we did and he left.
Click to expand...

I am almost afraid to point out how upset Poch was to lose him.
 
elltrev said:
I was genuinely wondering last night what Moura was thinking about GHod's role in the result. Just can't fathom how anyone could think GHod was playing a role in an individual or team's sporting performance, and how anyone could continue thinking that when they lose. Bizarre.
Click to expand...
Belief is ahellava thing. Just like how everything someone does in life is forgiven by his truly. So that entitles people to be clams as much as they want? It's Ridiculous.
Lets go back to 2008 when we would lose every game that Bale hand a hand in playing. Joking aside, there were certain mentalists on here who had that reason nailed on.

But yeah; Kick Racism out of Football, and Religion while youre at it.
 
Bedfordspurs said:
Because we could afford this wages at the time...
Nothing new to see here
It’s like people saying we should have found the extra £15m to pay for Dybalas image rights
Click to expand...
We actually could’ve afforded them, we just chose not to. Operating the lowest wage to income ratio in the league means that we, more than anyone, have the scope to raise our wage bill.
 
Bedfordspurs said:
Because we could afford this wages at the time...
Nothing new to see here
It’s like people saying we should have found the extra £15m to pay for Dybalas image rights
Click to expand...

We should have. If it had only been 15 million, not finding it would constitute one of the biggest blunders of all-time. Given that it was closer to 40, I still think we should have. Come on. The fee -given his value- was knock-down. And if we'd paid close to 90 mill for him, I think we might have seen the money coming back as 4th was very very doable this season. It isn't like we didn't know there was an issue!

As for the wages, I think the wider point is if you keep wanting that calibre of player yet keep getting NJie's and NKoudou's, you are going to feel you're not taken seriously after a while, especially when you establish CL football regularly. But yes. We could've paid them.
 
thfcsteff said:
We should have. If it had only been 15 million, not finding it would constitute one of the biggest blunders of all-time. Given that it was closer to 40, I still think we should have. Come on. The fee -given his value- was knock-down. And if we'd paid close to 90 mill for him, I think we might have seen the money coming back as 4th was very very doable this season. It isn't like we didn't know there was an issue!

As for the wages, I think the wider point is if you keep wanting that calibre of player yet keep getting NJie's and NKoudou's, you are going to feel you're not taken seriously after a while, especially when you establish CL football regularly. But yes. We could've paid them.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure Dybala would’ve made much difference anyway. We’re lacking at DM, CH, FB and number 9 cover. The one place we are actually well stocked is with 7s, 11’s and 10s.
 
thfcsteff said:
We should have. If it had only been 15 million, not finding it would constitute one of the biggest blunders of all-time. Given that it was closer to 40, I still think we should have. Come on. The fee -given his value- was knock-down. And if we'd paid close to 90 mill for him, I think we might have seen the money coming back as 4th was very very doable this season. It isn't like we didn't know there was an issue!

As for the wages, I think the wider point is if you keep wanting that calibre of player yet keep getting NJie's and NKoudou's, you are going to feel you're not taken seriously after a while, especially when you establish CL football regularly. But yes. We could've paid them.
Click to expand...
Yet man united didn’t pay it and we know they will throw money at anyone..
so why would we
 
Finney Is Back said:
We actually could’ve afforded them, we just chose not to. Operating the lowest wage to income ratio in the league means that we, more than anyone, have the scope to raise our wage bill.
Click to expand...
Not if we have to buy players too
Same problem as before
Up the wages takes away to invest
It’s interesting that Liverpool for example have moved to performance based contacts now as incentives which is exactly what we do
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back