City miss an ageing aguero... that shows to me they havent a real plan
Their next plan... buy an ageing messi to fix that issue
Their recruitment is very odd
The other player their missing is.... and ageing Fernandinho
So basically the6 miss old heads who now have more injury issues
What attacks did we ride our luck on by the way? There was some great defending but last season we were lucky. Yesterday IMO awe weren’t. They had a header form a free kick at distance straight at Hugo. The late effort he tipped over. Anything else?
The team operated as a unit as you say and did everything that was planned IMO
And we’ve got Matt Doherty (when he’s out of quarantine) who has played RCB for his country.I was surprised to hear José saying without Toby we now only have three CBs - Dier, Sanchez and Rondon. And only two in Europe as Rondon is still unavailable.
Doesn't he consider Tanganga a CB? Or is he injured long term? Also, Davies could always fill in at CB in an emergency.
Free header from 20 yards... rarely if ever scored. 2 great defensive blocks (defending defending). De Britney spanking several shots over as they got more frustratedFree header, that late Hugo save, a number of last ditch blocks, de Brauner shooting wide/over, the handball goal. We defended well in numbers. Would be nice to use the ball better so we reduce the time defending. Can’t fault our performance but we’re not the finished article. Lots more to come.
Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
Free header from 20 yards... rarely if ever scored. 2 great defensive blocks (defending defending). De Britney spanking several shots over as they got more frustrated
That’s how I saw it certainly
I saw city huff abs puff and create nothing
They had an XG of 2 after 22 shots... that’s really poor
Jose ha as system where he lets the opposition create nothing of quality and expects our players to take their chances of a better quality
this was Better football than anything they created and it was all quick quality passing
As I posted in the OMT, it's the way you almost 'obviously' play against City.plan was so counter intuitive but you could see we executed it to perfection
As I posted in the OMT, it's the way you almost 'obviously' play against City.
They will pass you to death, give them even more space to pass, you are 400% dying. This then works for you going the other way. City always give away chances. We have deadly chance takers.
They could always have a day when things go for them BUT I would say we are a bad match up for them.
They definitely have dropped a bit in quality since Silva left and Aguero, Fernandiho are absent.
It reminded me of when we used to play Arsenal during peak Wenger..gut wrenching as they have so much possession and movement. Constantly just trying to cope on a basic level.His tactics were absolutely spot on but very un-Tottenham. I wonder how a crowd would have received it because I was struggling watching it for a while.
As I posted in the OMT, it's the way you almost 'obviously' play against City.
They will pass you to death, give them even more space to pass, you are 400% dying. This then works for you going the other way. It gives us space. City always give away chances. We have deadly chance takers.
They could always have a day when things go for them BUT I would say we are a bad match up for them.
They definitely have dropped a bit in quality since Silva left and Aguero, Fernandiho are absent.
And what the fudge did Torres do to deserve a 7? He'll be lucky to get out of Aurier's pocket in time for next weekend!
Sunday Mirror was just as bad
And what the fudge did Torres do to deserve a 7? He'll be lucky to get out of Aurier's pocket in time for next weekend!
I’d add Kompany to the players who were vital to City’s success and have not been replaced by Fraudiola. It’s all well and good having a defining style of play but if it still boils down to having a world class spine of inherited players than I feel the success of the club is in spite of the manager, not because of him. It’s interesting that city have trusted him to oversee a rebuild, as his signings to date, with very little in the way of financial constraint would not inspire confidence. It feels like he is seen as the reason Messi will join and I’m not sure how he solves the (relative) on pitch problems they have.As I posted in the OMT, it's the way you almost 'obviously' play against City.
They will pass you to death, give them even more space to pass, you are 400% dying. This then works for you going the other way. It gives us space. City always give away chances. We have deadly chance takers.
They could always have a day when things go for them BUT I would say we are a bad match up for them.
They definitely have dropped a bit in quality since Silva left and Aguero, Fernandiho are absent.
Agree. I would say it is all a bit bizarre BUT people with a bottomless pit of money can be like that as cash is the so called problem solver. It's quite refreshing in football that cash has been reasonably proven to not be the be all and end all. Pep really has had an easy path everywhere he's been, he is a good manager but I wouldn't say his skillset is very wide. Plus I think he does have a character that you might get sick of (as a player).I’d add Kompany to the players who were vital to City’s success and have not been replaced by Fraudiola. It’s all well and good having a defining style of play but if it still boils down to having a world class spine of inherited players than I feel the success of the club is in spite of the manager, not because of him. It’s interesting that city have trusted him to oversee a rebuild, as his signings to date, with very little in the way of financial constraint would not inspire confidence. It feels like he is seen as the reason Messi will join and I’m not sure how he solves the (relative) on pitch problems they have.
Have you seen all or nothing the city one?Agree. I would say it is all a bit bizarre BUT people with a bottomless pit of money can be like that as cash is the so called problem solver. It's quite refreshing in football that cash has been reasonably proven to not be the be all and end all. Pep really has had an easy path everywhere he's been, he is a good manager but I wouldn't say his skillset is very wide. Plus I think he does have a character that you might get sick of (as a player).
I wonder if not having fans in the stadium during this transition in style, is a blessing in disguise? All the moaning and shouting 'attack' wouldn't be helpful. Everyone can now get used to it on TV before returning to the ground.His tactics were absolutely spot on but very un-Tottenham. I wonder how a crowd would have received it because I was struggling watching it for a while.
On the flip side against better teams we're likely to spend more time in a low block. Which suits Alderweireld for example. Extended periods where concentration, positioning, awareness and marking are so important to get right every time. Doesn't fit Sanches particularly well.I'm not so sure. I think that he is probably better suited to playing better teams. His pace allows us to push up a bit higher and compress play. He's also less likely to face aerial balls.
His form has been very poor this season though.
That's the difference. Yes they had chances and probably should have had at least one goal based on the chances they created. But we weren't carved open repeatedly like we have been in the past.It's how we played when we beat them at their place in the league a few years back, conceded possession and scored a couple of excellent counter attacking goals - we didn't keep them out at the back as well as we did yesterday mind