He's objectively less good at it than most on the team though.Sissoko can pass the ball to his team mates though.
He's objectively less good at it than most on the team though.Sissoko can pass the ball to his team mates though.
How you getting on with this?
Why don't we lock the Sissoko thread and come back in a month and see where we're at?
He's objectively less good at it than most on the team though.
I wonder if there are any still holding out from admitting they were wrong about HK?The only thing i would say to that is IF he improves and becomes a important part of our side do you REALLY believe that ALL his distractors will admit they were wrong. Not a chance.
I wonder if there are any still holding out from admitting they were wrong about HK?
I'm the only one to have backed up my opinion with facts. Please feel free to provide contrary evidence if you have some.There is that word again, the one thing you are not doing is being objective about Sissoko you have made that clear to everyone.
I'm the only one to have backed up my opinion with facts. Please feel free to provide contrary evidence if you have some.
You know the Earth is round(ish) and more than 6,000 years old, right?The one thing i am not going to do mate is get involved in debate about stats with you, been there, done that got the tee shirt you are obsessed with them. The problem with stats is they make some folks fail to see past the end of their noses. ( hint).
We will disagree.
You know the Earth is round(ish) and more than 6,000 years old, right?
That article has a ridiculous conclusion it says the following!
He's objectively less good at it than most on the team though.
I'm the only one to have backed up my opinion with facts. Please feel free to provide contrary evidence if you have some.
I know you're more intelligent than that. You know as well as I do that it's possible to win despite players.Haven't we won 9 games out of the 10 Sissoko started and drawn the other? Seems prettt conclusive to me.
I saw similar arguments for buying Benteke a little while ago. They were poor reasoning then and they still are now.Ok we're getting somewhere. Slightly better than the 'spaz off the leg' remark.
Now, he's a physical player, bought for his physicality. Quite frankly I expect him to not be as good at passing as most other players except for Wanyama.
I know you're more intelligent than that. You know as well as I do that it's possible to win despite players.
I saw similar arguments for buying Benteke a little while ago. They were poor reasoning then and they still are now.
Ok we're getting somewhere. Slightly better than the 'spaz off the leg' remark.
Now, he's a physical player, bought for his physicality. Quite frankly I expect him to not be as good at passing as most other players except for Wanyama.
I get that it's why he was bought - I think that Poch is wrong in both his reasoning and his choice of player. He's especially wrong in picking that player against teams we can pass around - like Everton.Well that was why he was bought, Poch was pretty much quoted as such. After the Liverpool 1-1 draw at home last year he talked of needing someone physical to break the lines and give the opposition something different to think about. It's taken a while, but Sissoko is now showing that.