• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

OMT Badgers vs Eagles

I agree with this except I wouldn't play 3 DMs. I'd have Gray as the holder, Sarr as the engine and Simons as the playmaker.

I'd bring Pahlinha on a 70 minutes to kill the game if we are ahead or clinging to a draw, but I wouldn't use him in a situation where we are wanting to be front-footed. His transitioning and breaking are just too slow
I agree with this. The extra protection isn't helping.... We need legs in the middle and able to transition.

However, I would think about Palinha at centre back, or in for Gray. He just has a hunger about him
 
To think he's scored 7 goals against us in his last 3 games! If Carlsberg did Tottenham failed transfers, etc...

Palace admin definitely trolling us…

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I listened to a LOT of podcasts today.
One (I think it was The Extra Inch) was saying that Tudor employed a man-to-man marking system against Fulham, to the extent that our players would follow Fulham players all over the pitch and thus we were pulled well out of shape e.g. Dragusin chasing someone all the way up the pitch.

I guess, Romero also does that kind of thing when he plays.
Due to this system we were very unsure who should be in which position and Fulham found pockets of space... although I would have thought that if we played a clear man-to-man marking system it would be obvious who should be marking Iwobi as he scores the second, etc.


Has that been discussed on here somewhere?
 
Back