Kingdawson
Banned
Cheers Mumorn.
Just reading Mick's leaving speech:ross:
Just reading Mick's leaving speech:ross:
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
O/T Most memorable post in Glory-glory history?
- Thread starter Little Luka
- Start date
WookieD
Didier Zokora
The first teenage lurker who managed to snag the name by the looks of it!
Howard Webb
Clive Wilson
cheers lol
I enjoy doing it
*it was approved if anyones wondering. some other guy has a similar account name.
Last edited:
milo
Jack L. Jones
Mick was given a one week ban. Having served his ban, Mick is free to post here as long as he sticks to the site rules. Whether he chooses to do so is down to him. Issuing these points to Mick was discussed at length between the admin team beforehand and we were in complete agreement.
Crawley
Board Legend
The Moonlit Knight
Banned
This. Especially considering people can just use the ignore feature.
The problem is on here there are way too many snidey WUMs who wouldn't have the bottle to insinuate what they do to your face. They'd snigger behind your back to their mates though. I think they even know who they are which makes it worse. All patting each other on the back and only really coming out on the offensive when they've got the confidence they'll have a couple of their mate posters backing them up. It's very subtle bullying and the mods do nothing about it. And yet when someone has the audacity to stick up for their views or call someone a prick when they're being a prick they get banned. Wouldn't be so bad but there are a couple of mods who are in with the snide clique. Probably why they can get away with it. I told Mick just to stick them on ignore, because you can't really take them head on anyway because you will get banned whilst they gang up on you and take turns digging away.
Personally I prefer unmoderated forums (definitely miss the usenet!) and now this forum comes with the function of ignore I don't really see why mods exist at all other than to clean out spam and to ban fans of other teams who come in here with the sole intention of starting a flame war.
Glory Glory is pretty poor comparitive to what it used to be. I just hope that at some point common sense comes back into play and maybe it can be restored to what it once was.
The Moonlit Knight
Banned
I'll be honest, using the ignore feature has worked for me. I have one or two posters that I have put on ignore that I sometimes think I may be missing out because they do post good stuff (in random that is!) but most of them I don't really give a second thought about.
The Moonlit Knight
Banned
Occasionally. I do find it quite amusing that some of them still reply to my posts with some sort of snide remark or to try and belittle my opinion knowing full well they are on block. They do it to try and take the tinkle and get their buddies to join in taking the tinkle too, but really all they're doing is making themselves look like utter macarons because I don't see what they write anyway. When you realise they posses that sort of intelligence level (or lack of) you realise that putting them on ignore is the best thing to do and you really aren't missing much and at the same time you don't get riled at their facetious comments.
Mick doesn't suffer fools gladly though, and he isn't one to just try and ignore people. If they're being dingdongs (in his opinion anyway) he'll call it out.....as is his right. Me and Mick have frequented the same forums for years, and have had our fair share of ding dongs, a couple of which got pretty nasty. But I do respect him because he says it how he sees it and isn't afraid to fight his corner even when ganged up on. Probably because he is usually in the right......
Crawley
Board Legend
For the record, some time back, after complaints about moderating, we agreed to let the forum run "un-moderated" for a period covering a long weekend (I believe).
Needless to say, it was an abject failure that lasted a matter of hours.
Another apt moment to remind you of this rule:
9. - Complaints about an Admin's Actions
We as administrators are not perfect. However, if you feel that you have been harshly treated the public forums are not to be treated as your personal venting space to attack a single admin or the admin as a whole.
Complaints about an admin's actions should be PM'd to another admin who will decide what further action is required. If an administrator agrees that the action taken was unfair then the admin in question will be warned and a public apology issued. Continued unnecessary actions from the admin will result in a removal of admin status.
Needless to say, it was an abject failure that lasted a matter of hours.
Another apt moment to remind you of this rule:
9. - Complaints about an Admin's Actions
We as administrators are not perfect. However, if you feel that you have been harshly treated the public forums are not to be treated as your personal venting space to attack a single admin or the admin as a whole.
Complaints about an admin's actions should be PM'd to another admin who will decide what further action is required. If an administrator agrees that the action taken was unfair then the admin in question will be warned and a public apology issued. Continued unnecessary actions from the admin will result in a removal of admin status.
I like how this forum has a range of different posters but I don't like weak individuals - on here or in real life. Everyone has weaknesses, granted, but some people really over do it. A few with chips on their shoulders too but you end up laughing at the majority of their drivel.
We're all here for one common love - that's what I try to remind myself whenever I read some tripe.
We're all here for one common love - that's what I try to remind myself whenever I read some tripe.
The Moonlit Knight
Banned
And we know what action would be taken don't we. Rhymes with Back Hit.
milo
Jack L. Jones
I think it is wrong to blame the posters who are on the receiving end of other posters abuse. I am not referring to any poster in particular here but arguments and personal spats often cut across threads, take them off topic and ruin the enjoyment of the board for others. If you want to abuse each other maybe you could find some like minded individuals and do it by PM.
Jurgen the German
Erik Thorstvedt
Totman was one of the best posters on here. He'd regularly take on up to 10 posters at the same time and wouldn't back down.
I only see the need for banning people if they get nasty or use racist language. If people have arguments on here and a few swear words get thrown about, and as long as it doesn't hijack the thread, I don't see a problem with it myself. People will always disagree on here.
I only see the need for banning people if they get nasty or use racist language. If people have arguments on here and a few swear words get thrown about, and as long as it doesn't hijack the thread, I don't see a problem with it myself. People will always disagree on here.