Don't forget their huge wage bill. Also, how many players did they send on loan last season?
As previously indicated I'm talking about the non playing side of things.
Don't forget their huge wage bill. Also, how many players did they send on loan last season?
I know everyone likes to jump on the City hating bandwagon, but outside of the headline transfer fees and overinflated sponsorship deals things are run very well.
As previously indicated I'm talking about the non playing side of things.
Weird that there has still never been any official statement to confirm its going ahead.
Weird that there has still never been any official statement to confirm its going ahead.
I'm still waiting for official confirmation of the rumoured capacity increase and / or for Spurs to submit the planning application for "material changes" to the stadium, as mentioned in a Haringey document a few months ago (at the time when Spurs successfully applied for permission to change other elements of the NDP).
Do you know if the 'kop' stand is still being considered Jimmy?
Cheers.As far as I know, yes. There was a report a while back (from someone who claimed to have seen a new design) which suggested that the single tier end had been changed but that it still looked impressive.
Have to say i'm struggling to see the way they're well run, seems like your saying apart from the ridiculous transfer fees, ridiculous wages, ridiculous sponsorship they pay themselves, apart from that they're run very well? So what exactly at a football club do they run well that isn't funded by something that isn't earned?
This is pretty exciting as far as I'm concerned. And enough about the oil baron twinks, this thread is about our new ground:
http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/spu...-led-regeneration-in-tottenham-16072012.page?
Think he's talking about THIS thread.