Yiddo
Jack Jull
apprently it doesnt matter. this kind of stuff is allowed. nothing to see here ..move on
Looks more like he owes money than talking about a transfer. or match fixing? :lol:
apprently it doesnt matter. this kind of stuff is allowed. nothing to see here ..move on
When are we leaving for the US - today?
Looks more like he owes money than talking about a transfer. or match fixing? :lol:
If Modders starts acting the dingdong is he not in breach of contract?
thiS is the bit i dont understand. its clear as day
Hard to tell if there is anything more in the story than the Sky seeing him arrive and leave Spurs Lodge. The rest of those articles could easily by built on things already mentioned in this thread.
Assuming that all other first team players are going on tour, I don't see that Spurs have a choice and have to insist he goes to the US. The clubs position is that he can leave if the price is right or he has to stay. There is no suitable offer at the moment so the default position is he is staying. If he is staying then he needs a preseason. Logically he still needs a preseason if he is leaving so there is no valid reason for him to skip the tour.
If the club accept that he is going and let him stay behind, then they lose any negotiating leverage, essentially telling Madrid they can have him eventually even if they don't pay the asking price. Modric refusing to go on tour would be an attempt to force a cut price sale. Essentially he would be breaking his contract and trying to defraud the club of true value of an asset, probably in return for a bonus from Madrid. That would be a crime in most businesses (except the financial sector where they too would probably give bonuses).
I hate it when people use the phone whilst sat at the table.
what remedies for said breach? force him to play. and he plays like brick or simply refuses. we dock his pay. leaves us short of a playmaker and no imminent replacement. leave him out? the longer he doesn't play in a public feud with the club results in the plummeting of his perceived value which is what we wanted to avoid in the first place. either way we are fudged. i am a fan and have a right to be irrational. stupid **** does not want to play for SPURS, he can just fudge off.
what remedies for said breach? force him to play. and he plays like brick or simply refuses. we dock his pay. leaves us short of a playmaker and no imminent replacement. leave him out? the longer he doesn't play in a public feud with the club results in the plummeting of his perceived value which is what we wanted to avoid in the first place. either way we are fudged. i am a fan and have a right to be irrational. stupid **** does not want to play for SPURS, he can just fudge off.
if you give in now then you give in all the time.