.........think you might be rightRound and round in circles. You’re willfully ignoring every single mitigating factor. And it IS willful at this point. You’ve had it in for him since he spoke about “auras”...fact.
Bit of trolling.....bit of WUMing......How big do you think the risk is that the manager we replace him with isn't as good, and gives us less success next season and beyond than Poch would have done if we'd kept him instead?
And on a completely separate note, just out of interest: what % of your tone on this forum is natural, innate and authentic vs an enjoyably provocative caricature of yourself?
Because he would be sacking himself... why would he do that
Always amazes me that people think he is an employee
Technically he gets paid to work for THFC
But he also owns a massive chunk of the club
Mate.....
It's a hypothetical question
We're all going take a stance on a given situation, and discussing it to the nth degree will just as often entrench positions than change minds.Not really Nayim. Here’s the difference. I deal only in opinions and conversations. When someone -even our forum sponsor- repeatedly bellow absolutes with no supportive text, then I am the sort of person who is wired to call them out. Even the addition of an “IMO”
keeps me at bay! But without clear irrefutable facts which bear scrutiny from different perspectives, I won’t be told by anyone “how it is” mate. That’s my wiring. Scara will get it for sure, and deep down he’ll be happy enough I won’t skulk off into the corner!
You’ll note I have both criticisms of Poch ( be hard not to!) and a certain sympathy for those who believe his sacking is the way forward.
FWIW I think a few of us who have been snapping at each other seem to have found that magic spot of opinions and agree to disagree. We all want the best for the club.
its daft...
The amount of times people say Levy must go!!!! He has to be sacked!!!
I sit there and just chuckle.
it’s typically the brain dead types on social media who just love to moan
If Levy didn’t own what he does he would have been sacked a long while ago I guess, but again that would have depended on the then ownermate come on!!! You can’t seriously think I mean what you’re saying I mean??
indulge me. Let’s say Levy owned nothing. Let’s say he was an appointed President by Joe Lewis and was sackable. I’d still be interested in Scara’s, and anyone’s, answer to my question there.
If Levy didn’t own what he does he would have been sacked a long while ago I guess, but again that would have depended on the then owner
there are some crazy people owning football clubs now
But he has had blips along the wayLevy has done nothing but deliver consistent growth and success, he would be getting bonus', not the sack.
Ups and downs along the way accepted, missed opportunities accepted.
Us in 2001, vs us today, is a night and day difference - and Levy is the key to it all.
But he has had blips along the way
And a more “stereotypical” type owner would have a sacked him
The reason he has been able to do what he has done is he has no interference, and has complete control
Blips for a person whose job is the long game arent as big a deal as for the person required to get immediate results.
Levys the chairman, not the manager.
And despite a few blips* his performance over the long term has been nothing short of sensational.
*and by blips, I suspect most people mean "didnt buy the players the manager wanted when we might have won something", which, in the scheme of things - not even blips to be honest.
interesting question...would you have sacked Levy if that was possible after the year we finished bottom half with Ramos? If not, why not?
i mean appointed the wrong man
bought the wrong players
The Levy question is just silly and typical of the Poch "whataboutism"
Let me explain why Levy shouldn't get sacked (even if he could be)
- He is responsable for many things, not specifically on pitch results (that's the manager's job which a lot of people don't want to admit)
- Levy has to manage the long term success of the club (the manager is short term on field success)
- Levy has out performed every single one of his peers over 19 years, not just in UK, but arguably in Europe
- Any credit that BMJ, Harry, Poch get is actually a reflection on Levy because he appointed them.
In 19 years Levy has achieved
- Talking a team more accustomed to finishes outside top 10 (previous 10 years before purchase by ENIC) to a top 4 side
- Increased the clubs revenue streams and managed costs better than almost every other club in PL (percentage growth I think is only matched/bettered by United)
- Built Infrastructure that will set the club up for long term (stadium, training facilities, transport link upgrades)
- Been truly innovative in approach with things like NFL
- Even people who hate him in the industry have a lot of respect for him and how he runs the club
Ramos was a calculated gamble, was a well respected proven winner who didn't work out (although did get us a cup success), and Levy did what he was supposed to do, pull the trigger and get a replacement to correct the situation (which Harry did and exceeded expectations).
My only issue with Levy and the only question mark right now is why is he delaying with Poch (conceding 7 at home should have been the end), but I completely have the confidence because of Levy that when we replace Poch, within two seasons we will be doing better than Poch did (as was the case with BMJ, Harry, etc.)
Thank you for at least engaging in the question. Can not believe how literally it was taken. Of course I don’t think Levy should be sacked.
But I don’t think it’s a silly question, not in the context of people saying ‘we should be top 3, we should never be out of the top 4 again, if we don’t finish top 4 it’s a massive failure.’ We finished below expectations a few times in Levy’s reign, but long term we have clearly progressed. Absolutely, no argument there.
So why is it not possible that we may fall below expectations on the pitch one season, and then bounce back the next? Why is it that the Manager should face ultimate punishment, removed of all context around why the club may be struggling? Why should Levy get the trust of delivering over the long term but the Manager doesn’t get that same point of view? Particularly when, as you say, what happens on the pitch is a reflection of Levy. The players available. The contract situations. The signings or the players that weren’t moved on. These are not things that Poch deals with in isolation. These are circumstances he deals with as a result of Levy’s decisions. The Rose thing is a great example - the club, the ‘Board’, clearly want to sell him, but he’s refusing to go, and Poch has a situation to manage. It is not purely about ‘what is the maximum level this player has performed at?’ It is about what circumstances may be going on around the club that may affect things on the pitch.
So I would challenge two things; the idea that the job of a coach is purely ‘short term results’ and that they don’t also have a long term responsibility. Because that is purely your opinion, it is not fact. And secondly, that the Manager simply has to get on with his job in isolation from the rest of the club, as if club decisions don’t effect things on the pitch. Because they do.
Levy has clearly progressed us over the long term. I am one of Levy’s biggest fans. But I find it interesting that people are willing to ascribe a long term KPI to Levy - and say that a dip in achievement for a year is ok because Levy has had us on an upward curve long term - but not to Poch. When Poch has had us similarly on an upward curve. And when clearly decisions that are taken by the club can effect things on the pitch.
When we are seeing things said like ‘the club must keep on moving, any dip is failure’, we are excusing Levy from any of his decisions playing a part in that dip. I could quite easily say well maybe he needs to go, particularly if we are taking a dip for one year as ultimate proof of his inadequacy. But clearly that isn’t the case for him, because he is excellent. That doesn’t mean however that decisions he takes don’t affect the club, or that it isn’t possible to recover after a dip.
I would argue our dip is a collective dip, and I would argue our successes were collective successes. And I would say that we are in a unique situation with a Manager that played a massive part in that achievement and a Chairman that trusts him more than most. I think it is just as likely in 2 years we are in a better situation than the last 2 with Poch, as without him. Because it a collective thing and I think we can recover together.