Don't get your point here? Are you saying Poch has mismanaged them? Because that is patently untrue.
Sanchez started well in an entirely different league to the one he had played in. He had a poor season last year but he is a right sided Centre back and our problems are well documented with our right full back, not to mention the midfield protection on front of him. The problems have not been solved this season yet but Aurier minus the brain farts is better than Trippier. Sanchez has looked really good in the last 2 games.
Lucas, has looked very good in spells, but we are blessed with a lot of competition amongst his type of player. Who is he going to displace? He is not better than Son and according to your posts in his thread, you rate Lamela very highly. I personally rate Dele highly albeit he is off form.
Foyth, a young inexperienced but very talented young CB/FB. Not ready yet, has to be managed carefully which he has been.
Aurier, when he has not been injured has been Ok but not as good as Walker and is reckless.
Our problem areas are still Right full back and defensive midfield neither of which have been replaced with the same quality player.
Let's compare to City and Pool. Both needed new keepers, they went out and bought better than they had in Ederson and Allison. They needed centre halves so they bought better than they had in La Porte and Van Dyke. They needed midfielders so Liverpool bought three, Winaldum, Fabinho and Keita. Emirates Marketing Project bought Gungdogen and Rodri. In general the top teams but better than they have. We have only really started to do that this last transfer window.
Mate, I'm saying you can't have conflicting narratives
- The squad hasn't been refreshed since Toby & Son and hence the lack of freshness is killing us (vs. manager issues)
Yet in that time
- Gazza, Sissoko, Sanchez, Foyth, Lucas, Aurier, Winks (+several other academy products) have all been available
Now you can make the argument that
- The quality has not been the right level (always subjective)
- You can argue that the manager has sucked at getting any of these players to consistently own a spot in starting 11 (subjective as well)
To your point, we are not talking anymore about our results against City or Pool
- We are talking about our results compared to Crystal Palace, Bournemouth, Sheffield who are above us on table. I'm too lazy to do the full 13 sides who have outscored us over the last 44 games (more than a full season)
- Do we really want to do squad comparisons against those, especially since the general opinion here seems to be Poch does better than anyone else with less resources
My arguments/comments about Poch come down to this
- He cannot be blameless in the performance of the squad, the lack of change in the squad or lack of development in very talented players
- The spend/wages/overachievement whataboutism is a red herring because we are not in the top 10 performers.
If we were 6th and being outperformed by the traditional big spenders, maybe even 7th, I'd say a lot of these points have merit
- But we are fudging 11th, and our form for over more than a full season has been around 14th
Do people really want to try to justify being outperformed by 13 other teams in this league?
- Does anyone really believe this squad, flaws or not, refresh or not, shouldn't sleepwalk at least 6th/7th?
- Pick a side outside the top 6, add Kane, Son, Jan and Gazza to it, what happens?
There is simply no narrative that truly supports anything other than the manager is failing, badly.
- If you believe he deserves some backing and help to turn it around, that's ok, admirable even
- But he has to own a lot of the blame, he has to bring performance up to at least par for the squad
Honestly it's a dead argument, either you accept Poch is part of the problem (justify the bold bit in your head) and therefore needs to be part of the solution, or you take the really lazy answer (squad fatigue) that has no sound basis other than grasping at straws.