Proof that opinions are like arseholes, everybody has one
And they stink of brick.
Proof that opinions are like arseholes, everybody has one
Assuming the point is he's young, at the age when predicting how a player and his career will develop is difficult and there's significant uncertainty about how good he will be in 2-3 years that's hardly random.Again a bit random. There are loads of players who were a bit brick at this age and stayed a bit brick. Likewise those there are that improved. One doesn't to the other.
How many of our forwards have?Has he earned a start vs Arsenal?
How many of our forwards have?
I take it, that's a yes?
Not for me, would start Richarlison. But I can see why the question gets raised. Frankly I struggle to see either of them getting much joy out of a start in that game. But Richarlison brings more physicality, experience and even with his weaknesses he's likely to be more of a presence in a game like that.Has he earned a start vs Arsenal?
Not for me, would start Richarlison. But I can see why the question gets raised. Frankly I struggle to see either of them getting much joy out of a start in that game. But Richarlison brings more physicality, experience and even with his weaknesses he's likely to be more of a presence in a game like that.
Has earned a sub appearance against Arsenal, also because we need to protect Richarlison from overplaying with both Kolo Muani and Solanke out.
Interesting suggestion; what qualities do you think Sarr would bring f we were to use him there as a one-off?No, it's a possibly. He has better movement than Johnson and Richardson. None of our options fill me with confidence of them scoring or holding the ball.
I think a radical solution would be to play Sarr at centreforward.
Another interesting suggestion, what qualities do you think Scarlet could bring if we played him there on the day?ScarlettWhen the game gets looser, and their defence tires, bring on the lightweights, Odobert/Xavi/Tel etc.
Richarlison......................................Kudus
Sarr
Palhinha....Bentancur
Interesting suggestion; what qualities do you think Sarr would bring f we were to use him there as a one-off?
Another interesting suggestion, what qualities do you think Scarlet could bring if we played him there on the day?
Very often with young unproven players who the manager seems reluctant to trust the answer is yes, they can do worse. Starting him against Arsenal would be an immense ask.Sarr would bring energy and enthusiasm, he's a good scorer and can win headers, neither Johnson or Richarlson appear to offer that at present. I think with Scarlett you could say give him a go, can he do any worse?
Very often with young unproven players who the manager seems reluctant to trust the answer is yes, they can do worse. Starting him against Arsenal would be an immense ask.
Wouldn't mind Sarr there. But would prefer Richarlison. Sarr can win headers, but how would he do in physical duels challenging for headers up against big centre backs. The headers he wins are typically not the kind of headers forwards are challenging for from long balls.
The randomness was in the comparison to Kane as if that is the barometer. You could just as easily compare him to Lorenzo Gonzalez, who at 20 was seen as a talent and has yet never hit the heights expected. Don't get me wrong, i'm not saying Gonzalez is a better comparison but neither is any more valid than the other. We just have to wait and see what happens with him, you have more confidence than I do but neither of us knows the future we can only go on what we've seen so far.Assuming the point is he's young, at the age when predicting how a player and his career will develop is difficult and there's significant uncertainty about how good he will be in 2-3 years that's hardly random.
To me he clearly has real talent and along with that he seems (as much as that can be judged from the outside) to have a good strong professional mentality. That's often a good combination.
Yeah. The Kane example is only one data point. I think that's rather obvious to everyone, including the poster who originally brought that up.The randomness was in the comparison to Kane as if that is the barometer. You could just as easily compare him to Lorenzo Gonzalez, who at 20 was seen as a talent and has yet never hit the heights expected. Don't get me wrong, i'm not saying Gonzalez is a better comparison but neither is any more valid than the other. We just have to wait and see what happens with him, you have more confidence than I do but neither of us knows the future we can only go on what we've seen so far.
Nah he knew what he was implying when he used it hence me saying it's a bit random. Why mention him specifically rather than a more general comment about players improving?Yeah. The Kane example is only one data point. I think that's rather obvious to everyone, including the poster who originally brought that up.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.