• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Kit Thread

Sponsor big enough on the navy shirt?

I still see no logic in having two dark alternative shirts. Get a bit if colour in the 3rd shirt!
 
Denmark Spur said:
This one going the rounds this morning

Pretty sure its fake :lol:


kmup.png
Click to expand...

yeah, i like them a lot..........no yellow, no sky blue thank GHod
 
There is no way we would have a sponsor that BIG on the shirt surely!! Don't mind the white kit if I'm honest...
 
We'll never have an Under Armour logo on a red background. Nor will Under Armour design with the same downloaded template that I did ;-)
 
bainz said:
There is no way we would have a sponsor that BIG on the shirt surely!! Don't mind the white kit if I'm honest...
Click to expand...

Pretty sure it is fake. Can't remember the exact dimensions but legally there is a top rate of area on a shirt that can be used for a sponser. That away kit would without a doubt breach that legislation.
 
Yeah that shirt is against league rules. They're obviously fakes but I like the home and the black/grey shirt, although I'd rather we had an actual contrasting colour like Yellow this time.
 
Mumorn said:
But that kit has black arms!!!
Click to expand...

But the main part is red and White stripes. There is many ways to change a kit from one year to the next to create buzz without changing the home shirt tradition, which is why I posted that picture and with Bale obviously. The exaggerated black stripe across the shoulders and down the arms for the long armed version is my point. You do not need to change the whole shirt.
 
http://worldsoccertalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Saudi Sportswashing Machine-united-home-shirt.jpg
 
Jordinho said:
http://worldsoccertalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Saudi Sportswashing Machine-united-home-shirt.jpg
Click to expand...

My point again, the subtleness of the blue lines means it distinguishes itself from previous shirts but the main theme is black and white stripes. I like. I hate the fricken sponsor though and cannot understand why a club would use them.
 
I hate the v neck on the home shirt.

The away blue is nice... and I'd like to put forward this as similar!

2woaety.jpg


:-k Brazil 2nd kit. Which should we sign Paulinho I might buy for my holiday (but for the v neck).

Third kit should go in the bin
 
I suppose that kind of V-neck isn't that bad.. its the V-neck kits with buttons or collars or lose v-necks. I prefer round neck t-shirts, don't have to tuck in the hair on my chest then, or shave it.
 
Superhudd said:
I suppose that kind of V-neck isn't that bad.. its the V-neck kits with buttons or collars or lose v-necks. I prefer round neck t-shirts, don't have to tuck in the hair on my chest then, or shave it.
Click to expand...

Yep, a v-neck is only good when you have another shirt underneath. I do not want to look at other guys' chests.
 
Superhudd said:
But the main part is red and White stripes. There is many ways to change a kit from one year to the next to create buzz without changing the home shirt tradition, which is why I posted that picture and with Bale obviously. The exaggerated black stripe across the shoulders and down the arms for the long armed version is my point. You do not need to change the whole shirt.
Click to expand...

Most clubs through their history have changed designs and kit structure.
The notion they have not is an idealistic fantasy.

On the Southampton note, throughout the entire 80s they had what can best be described as inverted Ajax. Red and white, yes. Stripes, no.

We are very lucky that our kit has stayed pretty consistent over the years, with only really short colours changing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back