I think we should all throw bananas at Terry next time we play Chelsea. In fact, the wholes premiership should.
I think we should all throw bananas at Terry next time we play Chelsea. In fact, the wholes premiership should.
Two wrongs....
I think we should all throw bananas at Terry next time we play Chelsea. In fact, the wholes premiership should.
The saddest thing to come out of this is the way ashley cole has behaved, he really will do anything for money wont he. I do not go into the whole race thing has i am white so i probably do not understand racism but i always thought the blacks were meant to stick together. I do not like the ones that have a chip on their shoulder but i always respected the ones that stuck by each other.
Ashley Cole is a disgrace to his people today.
It'd be fudging awkward if you missed badly and hit Adebayor
terry was always gonna be found not guilty. anyone remember the incident with ledley at the lane? was it confirmed terry said anything or was it just rumours
The clue was in Pascal Chimbonda's reaction!
Link?
It'd be fudging awkward if you missed badly and hit Adebayor
terry was always gonna be found not guilty. anyone remember the incident with ledley at the lane? was it confirmed terry said anything or was it just rumours
The saddest thing to come out of this is the way ashley cole has behaved, he really will do anything for money wont he. I do not go into the whole race thing has i am white so i probably do not understand racism but i always thought the blacks were meant to stick together. I do not like the ones that have a chip on their shoulder but i always respected the ones that stuck by each other.
Ashley Cole is a disgrace to his people today.
Link?
Terry's a lamentable character but this is actually a sound judgment in my view. The Magistrate does say that Terry's own version of events is unlikely to be true (basically calling him a lying little brick) but the problem lay in the fact that the footage simply wasn't conclusive enough to show that Terry definitely racially abused Ferdinand (he didn't deny saying the words but disputes the context in which he said them).
The burden of proof of course lies with the prosecution to prove the charge beyond all reasonable doubt and in the absence of any eye witness testimony to support their case (even Ferdinand said that he didn't actually hear the words at the the time), this was always going to be an uphill battle.
If the test was one of 'balance of probability', as it is in the civil courts, I am pretty sure that the Magistrate would have comfortably returned a guilty verdict.