Hashegotthesackyet?
Gudni Bergsson
Surprised John Stones has a thread in the Spurs forum.
WTF has he got to do with us. Hardly a viable target.
WTF has he got to do with us. Hardly a viable target.
Of course.. so no need to reply at all to it then
Same could apply to you maybe?
Would definitely take him as he's a cut above Dier and Sanchez but two things make me think this won't happen:
1. City won't want to sell to us
2. He's a nice ball playing centre back. Not really the type of CB Jose likes.
Why won't City sell to us? They have previously as we have sold to them also.
Stones was never a ball playing CB, he just looked good at doing basic things that defenders should be able to do in the modern game. I have never seen him as this silky ball playing CB, rather a player that plays well in a system and sticks to basics.
We sold them, Walker. Has there been much other recent business between us? I really believe this is the last signing we need to have a squad as good as anyone else's. City will know that too.
Anytime I've seen Stones, he's fancied himself as a ball-playing centre back. And he's pretty good too. Better on the ball than most centre backs. He's almost a really good Foyth which I don't mean as an insult.
Don't get me wrong, I'd gladly have him but I just don't see it.
might as well have kept Foyth. I always thought Arteta would take him to Goons and complete a wonderful partnership with sideshow Bob!
If we're going for Stones, we might as well have kept Foyth. With a consistent run of games he could have come really good for us.
The problem is he isn't actually good. The hype is mainly because for an English CB he is very comfortable on the ball and that is relatively rare on these shoes. Defensively he's a mess and always has been. The belief had been that you could improve his defensive skills but it's never going to happen.Some people would mock it as a deal given Emirates Marketing Project's defence, but if its a loan with option to buy, I wouldnt have a problem with it at all. Home grown as well, and we're short of a body at CB in my view