• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Jan Paul van Hecke

Cautious welcome! For me, I would want Danso to be part of our back line. He is such a solid defender and we need that in the back line. Can’t have 4 ballers at the back who don’t do the basics of defending otherwise we will continue to leak goals.
 
Cautious welcome! For me, I would want Danso to be part of our back line. He is such a solid defender and we need that in the back line. Can’t have 4 ballers at the back who don’t do the basics of defending otherwise we will continue to leak goals.
I think there's a bit of an assumption based on the fact that he's very good with the ball that he can't defend. Brighton conceded the third least goals in the league last season, so I'm pretty confident he can defend just fine....
 
I think there's a bit of an assumption based on the fact that he's very good with the ball that he can't defend. Brighton conceded the third least goals in the league last season, so I'm pretty confident he can defend just fine....
Verbruggen and Van Hecke were great in the Fantasy Football stats.
 
I think there's a bit of an assumption based on the fact that he's very good with the ball that he can't defend. Brighton conceded the third least goals in the league last season, so I'm pretty confident he can defend just fine....
It’s about partnerships. Goals conceded or not are rarely because of one player. At Brighton he has Lewis Dunk doing the water carrier role. We need partnerships that complement each other. We saw that when Romero was injured and Danso replaced him alongside VDV. Neither Van Hecke nor VDV are not good in the air for example.
 
Last edited:
Back