• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ITK Thread

I wanted Eze last season. He gives us several very creative options.

A pity we didn’t take a punt on Eze for £17m when he tearing it up with QPR but guess we were still hoping Bergwijn would come good that summer he moved to Palace.

Seem crazy now that Olise’s release clause was only £8m when he was voted EFL YPotY but we ended up spending treble that on Bryan Gil instead!

 
A pity we didn’t take a punt on Eze for £17m when he tearing it up with QPR but guess we were still hoping Bergwijn would come good that summer he moved to Palace.

Seem crazy now that Olise’s release clause was only £8m when he was voted EFL YPotY but we ended up spending treble that on Bryan Gil instead!

Olise is fantastic, but also needed time at Palace to step up. Was the perfect next step for him. Would we have been?

For sure one we "missed out on" along with Wharton. That will always happen. But the years of hardly trying with young talents still hurts us. Glad we're trying for more of a pokemon approach now.
 
We wanted him in the summer
I’ve heard that from several clues up football guys
We thought we had it done
Palace went early and showed why
Wharton missed 18 games / 100 days due to injury last season, dread to think how he’d have fared trying to single handed shield our CBs playing Angeball!
 
A pity we didn’t take a punt on Eze for £17m when he tearing it up with QPR but guess we were still hoping Bergwijn would come good that summer he moved to Palace.

Seem crazy now that Olise’s release clause was only £8m when he was voted EFL YPotY but we ended up spending treble that on Bryan Gil instead!


So you'd prefer us to take a punt on younger players?

I dunno like yang, odobert, tel, moore, donley?
 
A pity we didn’t take a punt on Eze for £17m when he tearing it up with QPR but guess we were still hoping Bergwijn would come good that summer he moved to Palace.

Seem crazy now that Olise’s release clause was only £8m when he was voted EFL YPotY but we ended up spending treble that on Bryan Gil instead!

We were interested in both
But we didn’t have a pathway into the team (something we still have issue with IMO) and others moved quicker
Shame as the talent was clear
If someone brings in big numbers in that division they will do decent in the role as a minimum
I remember saying about Bowen
Cahill was another who was bloody effective and stepped up
The championship is on par with a lot of global league because of the volume of games in front of big crowds
 
A pity we didn’t take a punt on Eze for £17m when he tearing it up with QPR but guess we were still hoping Bergwijn would come good that summer he moved to Palace.

Seem crazy now that Olise’s release clause was only £8m when he was voted EFL YPotY but we ended up spending treble that on Bryan Gil instead!

Gil was another horrendous signing.
We seem to always miss out on the gems from the championship. I know we got Gray, but he cost 40 mill so not really a coup.
Look at Bowen, Eze, Wharton, Olisse, Watkins to name a few.
 
But we didn’t have a pathway into the team (something we still have issue with IMO) and others moved quicker

This has always been a challenge at Spurs. You want these younger players to fail fast or obviously succeed.

I was hoping this new wave of academy players would not suffer in the same way KWP or Japhet did and spend years ticking homegrown boxes whilst not really playing. It's perhaps too early to tell whether the 12-15 academy products will be given a chance or whether we will just keep buying more experienced bodies like Danso or extending contracts like we have with Davies.

In some ways it would have been good to deal with some of this as the subs bench has increased to 9 over the years. Having a set number of club trained or U21 players in every 20 man match day squad would have been an interesting concept.
 
This has always been a challenge at Spurs. You want these younger players to fail fast or obviously succeed.

I was hoping this new wave of academy players would not suffer in the same way KWP or Japhet did and spend years ticking homegrown boxes whilst not really playing. It's perhaps too early to tell whether the 12-15 academy products will be given a chance or whether we will just keep buying more experienced bodies like Danso or extending contracts like we have with Davies.

In some ways it would have been good to deal with some of this as the subs bench has increased to 9 over the years. Having a set number of club trained or U21 players in every 20 man match day squad would have been an interesting concept.
To some extent it's an inherent problem with where we are and where we want to be. Easier for a mid table club to give game times and a quicker path to the first team.

But it's also something we need to succeed at. Little point hoarding young talents and not play them or give them a path.

Positive signs the season that went with Bergvall and Gray in particular. Tel and Odobert getting meaningful game time.

Think and hope Frank will be good with that.
 
To some extent it's an inherent problem with where we are and where we want to be. Easier for a mid table club to give game times and a quicker path to the first team.

But it's also something we need to succeed at. Little point hoarding young talents and not play them or give them a path.

Positive signs the season that went with Bergvall and Gray in particular. Tel and Odobert getting meaningful game time.

Think and hope Frank will be good with that.
But they aren’t the youth players
They are all acquisitions who are young
Our own youth team is developing top players but they need the next step to grow
 
Back