Rossi22
Pedro Mendes
Did he?
56/60 passing suggests he did? I remember one where he kicked the ball straight out of play which was a bit crap but otherwise ...
Did he?
Dembele was our only player that stood out
He did well in certain aspects but you can't play a major part in conceding two goals and still have an outstanding performance. He was unfortunate to be played on the wing but he should be clever enough to know when he's got to cover for Walker. If that meant playing more conservatively then it's not a problem, we had a three goal lead to hold on to.
He did well in certain aspects but you can't play a major part in conceding two goals and still have an outstanding performance. He was unfortunate to be played on the wing but he should be clever enough to know when he's got to cover for Walker. If that meant playing more conservatively then it's not a problem, we had a three goal lead to hold on to.
Livermore is there basicaly to run, tackle and pass simple. He did that yesterday and that's generally what he always does.
It just goes to show quite what a good job that Lennon does tracking back when you see that first goal last night plus the first goal at Anfield, as both might have been prevented had Dembele been covering like Aaron invariably does when Walker is out of position.
Lennon had some brilliant block yesterday one stood out towards the end of second extra time and Cassano was lining up a shot he came out of nowhere to block it
Not often I air my views on this forum, usually just read away at your interesting comments. So please tell me to shut the chuff up if I am way out of order.
Scott Parker really has to move on at the end of the season, the guy is so limited in what he can do its embarrassing. Ok he can tackle, receive the ball then pass it back to who ever he receives it from, or he might run around in a tight circle then pass it back!! He also has tendency to make run with a ball then suddenly think "oh brick what do I do now" and run into an opponent and fall over. Runs around like a chicken with no head.
Not often I air my views on this forum, usually just read away at your interesting comments. So please tell me to shut the chuff up if I am way out of order.
Scott Parker really has to move on at the end of the season, the guy is so limited in what he can do its embarrassing. Ok he can tackle, receive the ball then pass it back to who ever he receives it from, or he might run around in a tight circle then pass it back!! He also has tendency to make run with a ball then suddenly think "oh brick what do I do now" and run into an opponent and fall over. Runs around like a chicken with no head.
Livermore is there basicaly to run, tackle and pass simple. He did that yesterday and that's generally what he always does.
And as I said on the previous page he completed 56 of 60 passes so he did keep it simple and no he didn't keep fudging it up.
We can't solve anything sitting typing away behind our keyboards, either on the pitch or in the boardroom. Yet here we all are still, writing away to no end.
Really? So in your view, when exactly is it appropriate for a fan to air their views on how the team could improve? We've ascertained that is is unacceptable to do it in a good run. We can't do it when we've lost 2 in a row. Do fans wait until we've lost 5 in a row before they're allowed to air any criticism of the team before you won't have a low opinion of them?
No team is perfect and there will always be improvements to be made, faults in the team which can be changed. And while I think there is a hint of exaggeration in that post, I do agree that in terms of footballing intelligence (however you want to define that), our team is actually quite dumb. A lot of excellent players in there but in terms of the pass and move or incisive passing, a lot of our otherwise excellent players don't possess that.
What is it with stats? whats the obsession on this forum with stats?
Jenas also used to keep it 'simple' yet he was literally abused on these forums - yet I bet his 'sideways' passing was just as good as Livermores. I like Livermore as he puts in effort etc but I can also see his pure limitations.
We can't solve anything sitting typing away behind our keyboards, either on the pitch or in the boardroom. Yet here we all are still, writing away to no end.
Really? So in your view, when exactly is it appropriate for a fan to air their views on how the team could improve? We've ascertained that is is unacceptable to do it in a good run. We can't do it when we've lost 2 in a row. Do fans wait until we've lost 5 in a row before they're allowed to air any criticism of the team before you won't have a low opinion of them?
No team is perfect and there will always be improvements to be made, faults in the team which can be changed. And while I think there is a hint of exaggeration in that post, I do agree that in terms of footballing intelligence (however you want to define that), our team is actually quite dumb. A lot of excellent players in there but in terms of the pass and move or incisive passing, a lot of our otherwise excellent players don't possess that.
Stats aren't the be all and end all but in this scenario I think he's got you there...
It wasn't an easy game to shine in, I don't think he was utterly dreadful and he wasn't good either.
If he'd given the ball away like Dembele did for one of the goals he'd have been hung drawn and quartered for it.
Livermore has shown in the right system which plays to his strengths he can be a very useful player, I still think he will come good this season and be a useful part of the squad.