As are uefa, painting themselves as the good guys against esl while totally failing to implement financial fair play, despite paying lip service to the idea.The media are a bunch of slags. They argue on one hand about the inequality in the game and how the esl will destroy football. Then tell everyone the grealish, kanes etc... need to go to bigger clubs because they deserve trophies.
This smacks of the bale transfer. Where he went to spain for 2 weeks.
Wasn't to force a move. Deal was in place.
Just everyone getting their houses in order first.
Has he not been given the remit of Harry Kane will not be sold no matter what?
I think we can clearly see that there has always been a figure. It appears that figure is 160 million. Charlie Kane certainly thinks so, and you'd have to wonder why he arrived at that figure.
As for Levy going back on his word, I'm not so sure. I think the position has always been very clear. Harry Kane won't be sold unless someone comes in with a fair market value bid for him. Given that Grealish (a very good player of course) is valued at 100 million, there is some sliver of an argument to say that selling Kane for 160 million would be giving City a discount they don't deserve, as Kane is easily worth at least 80 million more than Grealish.
Kane obviously doesnt think he's worth that much and is desperate to join a team who agree he's not worth it.
I think we can clearly see that there has always been a figure. It appears that figure is 160 million. Charlie Kane certainly thinks so, and you'd have to wonder why he arrived at that figure.
As for Levy going back on his word, I'm not so sure. I think the position has always been very clear. Harry Kane won't be sold unless someone comes in with a fair market value bid for him. Given that Grealish (a very good player of course) is valued at 100 million, there is some sliver of an argument to say that selling Kane for 160 million would be giving City a discount they don't deserve, as Kane is easily worth at least 80 million more than Grealish.
This is what bugs me the most, Kane clearly rates himself as one of the top strikers in the world, therefore he must be sold for the amount of a top world class striker, ie close to the world record transfer fee. The fact that the pandemic has hit clubs hard is irrelevant. You won't see Ferrari dropping the price of their cars because of Covid, then again I haven't been looking at Ferrari prices of late so don't go doing any research to debunk my examples...He himself mentioned “£100m” in the Neville video, honestly the more I think about it the more it was clearly planned out from the start to get that number out there. Even Neville laughs at him for thinking that does the job.
We’ve been in these situations before but I don’t recall Levy ever letting the player go below the price we want, they were sold but never for less than we wanted. (Correct me if I’m wrong…)
I wouldn't want Levy to give his word and go back on it to our players.A funny old world when an (imagined) mans word is worth more than a multi million pound contract
Said it before. Think he will leave in this window, and once he has won his money-bought trophies with CIty and passed, or got very close to Shearer's PL haul and Rooney's England goals tally, I see him returning to Spurs to finish his career and overhaul Greaves' Spurs goals record
He himself mentioned “£100m” in the Neville video, honestly the more I think about it the more it was clearly planned out from the start to get that number out there. Even Neville laughs at him for thinking that does the job.
We’ve been in these situations before but I don’t recall Levy ever letting the player go below the price we want, they were sold but never for less than we wanted. (Correct me if I’m wrong…)
Hurry up and give us £150m and let’s all just move on.
Hurry up and give us £150m and let’s all just move on.
There is no evidence to suggest that Levy has gone back on his word. Let's assume there is a 'gentleman's agreement', what does that really mean? It does not mean we will sell him for £100m, it means we will sell him when we get an acceptable offer. The £100m offered about a month ago is clearly unacceptable.No I'm siding with the reality that a man is only as good as his word. Levy going back on his word and kane not training, going back on his word when he signed the contract just reads for a messy divorce.
This. Whilst some will find Levy has made errors in the past by not paying over the odds (Grealish for example) for a player, in my eyes he has done nothing wrong here. He is just holding onto his most prized asset and hasn't had a bid anywhere near his valuation of said prized asset. Kane really is acting strangely here yet a lot of the journalists and football world are seeing that Spurs are in the wrong. I don't understand how anyone can think that his actions are the right way to go.There is no evidence to suggest that Levy has gone back on his word. Let's assume there is a 'gentleman's agreement', what does that really mean? It does not mean we will sell him for £100m, it means we will sell him when we get an acceptable offer. The £100m offered about a month ago is clearly unacceptable.
Or Kane needed to do was to come to training every morning and keep his gob closed until Emirates Marketing Project make an acceptable bid.
Fact, Levy is not the bad guy here.
Sent from my SM-G975F using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app