johnola
Jermaine Jenas
Why would these senses be shielded from the forces of natural selection? Without the pressure from natural selection to keep such senses there's no reason to think they would have survived in a meaningful way. Mutations are relatively common on the timescales you're talking about, and most of them are harmful.
Brain development is fairly plastic and in need of sensible sensory input to take place, this is why people that are born with sensory deficits that are corrected as adults will almost without exception (as far as I know) have significant problems interpreting the sensory input when the deficit is later corrected by surgery. I see no reason why people would be able to detect the kind of sensory inputs you're talking about triggering visions of the supernatural.
If we had magnetic or electrochemical senses like you postulate that should very much be detectable by science, I have heard of no such evidence. If for example a magnetic sense like you postulate was present you would expect people would be able to detect magnetism with some accuracy higher than chance, I don't think that happens.
I don't see any way it could be accurately described as a "lifeforce" if it existed.
Meanwhile we have a ton of evidence for our cognitive shortcomings that are the suspected reasons for these so called paranormal phenomena. In line with current evolutionary thinking by the way. And not dependent on nondescript sensory leftovers.
Bangs head against wall. Sees stars, these are not sensory leftovers. These are not sensory leftovers.
Crrys salty tears, these are not oceanic leftovers these are not oceanic leftoverse
(you have athe option of having a **** instead of crying, same thing re origin).
Cannot detect electricity, puts **** in socket.
Cannot detect magnetism, stiffens resolve with iron supplement.
We are animals.