thfcsteff
George Hunt
Good. All the dingdongheads in one place makes it easier for me to focus my abuse in a more efficient manner.
Good. All the dingdongheads in one place makes it easier for me to focus my abuse in a more efficient manner.
True. Bilic got it right yesterday, but the jury is still out on him I've seen. He is a bit of a nutcase isnt he?
It would be just typical to see the haggling over 2-3 million euros cost us a player. I know Keith was banging on about it in another thread and I was against paying stupid fees early on that we can't afford, but when it comes to such small amounts I feel as ****ed off as the next fan.
As for Alvaro Vadillo, we've been liked with him for over a year and I cannot see why. He doesn't look all that good and has a buyout clause that does not represent his value. I did read somewhere that he only has two years left on his contract, so maybe it's his agent making noise to get his client a better deal.
What if it is not us doing the haggling and it is all Lyon? Nothing we can do there. I have more trust in Levy and our team in getting things done quickly, but it takes 3 parties to agree on a deal.
What if it is not us doing the haggling and it is all Lyon? Nothing we can do there. I have more trust in Levy and our team in getting things done quickly, but it takes 3 parties to agree on a deal.
What if it is not us doing the haggling and it is all Lyon? Nothing we can do there. I have more trust in Levy and our team in getting things done quickly, but it takes 3 parties to agree on a deal.
the Lloris deal, according to Aulas the Lyon chairman
We had people speaking all night with Daniel Levy. He talks a lot and goes back on what we’ve agreed in writing. Agreements have not at all been respected.
The first negotiation was at the start of the window, about a month and a half ago, through an intermediary who was a French lawyer who lives in Lyon. And then nothing for about a month and a half. The negotiation then picked up again about a week ago.
We had email exchanges which have been contradicted, so that’s made it very complicated. It’s difficult. The Tottenham board’s theory is to explain that the economic market is very hard and so we have to get used to renegotiating.
It’s been very, very difficult. I’ve got 25 years of experience as a president of a club and it’s our 16th participation in a European competition in a row. But this is very rare in the football world. The negotiation with the Tottenham directors has been the hardest I have ever had to undergo in these 25 years.”
i think both parties have to sit down and thrash out a deal. As the buyer, the onus is on us to make the first move and make a bid.I'd imagine we're still some way apart on the valuation, which, to my mind, could explain why we've made no bid. No point, if we know it won't be entertained.
"You'll take, say, fifteen million pounds?"
"No, we'll take, say, twenty-five million pounds."
Et cetera.
So i guess you are using the example of Lloris transfer to show that Levy must be doing the same thing here. I don't see the relevance, but did find it an interesting read. Then I did a bit of research on Aulas. He's known himself as a bit of a tough negotiator and actually the following examples show long, drawn out affairs when it has come to him selling his best players (what any chairman would do to extract maximum value).
Essien - http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/Chel53a/4152512.stm - Lots of quotes where Aulas is changing the price and stance;
Diarra - http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/africa/4799091.stm - Quote from Diarra saying what the opening price was, and he actually eventually went for less;
Malouda - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-465860/Chel53a-arent-Malouda-deal-blast-Lyon.html & http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/Chel53a/6257894.stm- Says Chel53a are not serious but we all know what then happened.
He is the Levy of the French league!
So our chairman drives a hard bargain.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...6m-says-Lyon-president-Jean-Michel-Aulas.html - So here he says the fee was £16m. So the intermediary then gets involved. Nothing for a month and a half, and then the real negotiations begin.
We all know what the fee ended up being. Could it be that he changed the goal posts himself a bit and didn't manage to get what he wanted? Or, he has come out with the latest to save face from the fact that he didn't get the €20m that he initially expected.
For every transfer that seems to be dragging, there is an example of a quick transfer. We tied up Dele Ali, Wimmer, Trippier and Alderweireld quite quickly. We did the same with Modric, Berbatov, Soldado, Paulinho etc...
Our chairman has form with both, so why would I believe one over the other.
Alderweireld took weeks, though. As did Trippier: there were a rush of articles claiming we were close to signing him, and then it took another two weeks before we actually confirmed it.
By contrast, Rondon was linked to West Brom a couple of days ago and was officially signed today.
Yes, we do do deals quickly (Wimmer was a quick one, I agree: as was Alli) at times. And certainly, other clubs probably take their time with some deals as well. However, there are certainly grounds for suggesting that, for us, quick deals are rarer than the ones where we seemingly haggle for weeks on end before finally concluding an often torturous saga that many are just relieved to see end.
i think both parties have to sit down and thrash out a deal. As the buyer, the onus is on us to make the first move and make a bid.
I understand that but it's only the press and the ITKs that have made it seem like this has been drawn out. There are just so many moving parts to a transfer that I can't see why we would think that someone like Levy who desperately wants success would want to drag getting in another player if it could be avoided. I don't believe it is him in the main as he has form with quick transfers just as much as slow transfers. Besides that, I don't think we should be using press speculation as a means to decipher when we were first interested. He could be option 33 for all we know.
My take, and at the risk of sounding like a broken record , is that we are trying to get our targets in quickly but the calibre of player we are trying to get lends itself to a drawn out affair more often than not, as these types of player are of a high quality. Taking Berahino as an example, would it not be a sensible thing for WBA to get a replacement in first, and use Emirates Marketing Project as a means of trying to extract more money from us, much like Levy did with the sales of Berbatov, Modric and Bale. More money that we just can't afford to pay without it having a knock on effect on something else.
I understand that but it's only the press and the ITKs that have made it seem like this has been drawn out. There are just so many moving parts to a transfer that I can't see why we would think that someone like Levy who desperately wants success would want to drag getting in another player if it could be avoided. I don't believe it is him in the main as he has form with quick transfers just as much as slow transfers. Besides that, I don't think we should be using press speculation as a means to decipher when we were first interested. He could be option 33 for all we know.
My take, and at the risk of sounding like a broken record , is that we are trying to get our targets in quickly but the calibre of player we are trying to get lends itself to a drawn out affair more often than not, as these types of player are of a high quality. Taking Berahino as an example, would it not be a sensible thing for WBA to get a replacement in first, and use Emirates Marketing Project as a means of trying to extract more money from us, much like Levy did with the sales of Berbatov, Modric and Bale. More money that we just can't afford to pay without it having a knock on effect on something else.
Berahino, Njie, Werner, Embolo, Martial earlier in the window....all are good quality, mainly potential, but definitely not high quality yet.
Sure, but again, I'd direct you to the Aulas/Lloris situation: Aulas first had an inquiry from us at the start of the summer 2012 window, and then only got follow-up inquiries two-odd months later. Then, he thought he'd agreed a fee, only for Levy to come back and offer a lower amount than what was previously agreed, claiming that renegotiation was a fact of the market. The consequence of all that was that we signed Lloris on deadline day, and Aulas (no doubt) bitterly cursed our name in the highly amusing Gallic way.
Like it or not, that sort of thing is an indicator of what we do behind the scenes. I don't think it's something we do with every transfer, by any means (Alli, Wimmer et al, although there's an argument to be made for those players being beneath the 'calibre' you're referring to), but that we do it more often than is entirely healthy for us is a proposition which certainly has merit, imo. And that's without going into individual cases like Schneiderlin last season and Moutinho in 2012: instances where we seemingly were the only ones interested,and still tried the 'long-drawn out' approach.