Frank Give him time or get rid?

[Baleforce]

What makes you think we should back him after what we continue to see week after week?

He has proven he can build a successful PL team.

He has the right attitude to the game, he prioritises working against the opposition rather than arrogantly thinking we can do the same thing every week.

 

[Chrissivad]

He has proven he can build a successful PL team.

He has the right attitude to the game, he prioritises working against the opposition rather than arrogantly thinking we can do the same thing every week.

At the moment we are doing the same thing every week

Lose a player to injury.
Let in goals
Create Very little
Pass backwards rather than forward
Put in lots of crosses to noone
Lose

 

[El Dante]

He has proven he can build a successful PL team.

He has the right attitude to the game, he prioritises working against the opposition rather than arrogantly thinking we can do the same thing every week.

Brentford were midtable. When has he proven to be capable of building a successful Premier League team?

 

[Baleforce]

At the moment we are doing the same thing every week

Lose a player to injury.
Let in goals
Create Very little
Pass backwards rather than forward
Put in lots of crosses to noone
Lose

West Ham’s best player is the fat lad on the right, we shut him down.

Sunderlands best player is their LB, we shut him down.

We don’t always target the same part of the opposition setup.

I don’t think it’s the same every week.

 

[Baleforce]

Brentford were midtable. When has he proven to be capable of building a successful Premier League team?

For Brentford that is massive success.

 

[Chrissivad]

West Ham’s best player is the fat lad on the right, we shut him down.

Sunderlands best player is their LB, we shut him down.

We don’t always target the same part of the opposition setup.

I don’t think it’s the same every week.

And what did we do to get the best out of our players?

 

[glasgowspur]

West Ham’s best player is the fat lad on the right, we shut him down.

Sunderlands best player is their LB, we shut him down.

We don’t always target the same part of the opposition setup.

I don’t think it’s the same every week.

And still didn’t beat either, at home, maybe there's more to managing than shutting down one player.

 

[El Dante]

For Brentford that is massive success.

Well Brentford ought to be a tier down from where we are, and what’s acceptable for us. Plus Frank left and they’re still right up there under a new inexperienced manager.

 

[Ace Face]

Trying to take the emotion of of the situation, but…

…what single thing have we done well under TF that warrants keeping him?

 

[DubSpur]

West Ham’s best player is the fat lad on the right, we shut him down.

Sunderlands best player is their LB, we shut him down.

We don’t always target the same part of the opposition setup.

I don’t think it’s the same every week.

We should be more worried about our own play than stopping an opposition player. Get that right first and then we can start adapting to the opposition,

 

[Danishfurniturelover]

Has not got it, thanks but there is the door.

 

[Baleforce]

We should be more worried about our own play than stopping an opposition player. Get that right first and then we can start adapting to the opposition,

I think it has to be the other way around.

 

[camspur]

He has proven he can build a successful PL team.

He has the right attitude to the game, he prioritises working against the opposition rather than arrogantly thinking we can do the same thing every week.

Thing is he hasn't.
Finishing no higher than 9th and 2 seasons in the bottom half is not a successful PL team.
Saying "it was at Brentford" so successful is not proof of success only proof of average managing, it's finishing where you expect them to finish.
There wasn't even a deep cup run in those 4 seasons.

 

[DubSpur]

I think it has to be the other way around.

No, if we're constantly worried about how the opposition play then we're never going to develop our own play. Need to have that sorted then can make tweaks based on the opponent.

 

[Baleforce]

No, if we're constantly worried about how the opposition play then we're never going to develop our own play. Need to have that sorted then can make tweaks based on the opponent.

I’m not sure we ever need to do that. I think it’s possible to be a reactive team that exists solely on opposing mistakes.

 

[Baleforce]

Thing is he hasn't.
Finishing no higher than 9th and 2 seasons in the bottom half is not a successful PL team.
Saying "it was at Brentford" so successful is not proof of success only proof of average managing, it's finishing where you expect them to finish.
There wasn't even a deep cup run in those 4 seasons.

It’s about performance relative to resource.

 

[Raziel]

why is he still here?

 

[camspur]

It’s about performance relative to resource.

By that logic we should be top 6 if he is successful based on resources

 

[ricky2tricky4city]

Glasner will be gone by the morning after that interview.

 

[Krombopulos Michael]

I´m no expert but relying on crosses when there is no player who wins headers in the box sounds like a bad plan. And yes, the goal came from a header after a cross but only because a center back strayed out of position into the box. This does not sound like Frank is a tactical genius to me.