He's bluffing, I can tell he's bluffing.
He's bluffing, I can tell he's bluffing.
curious as to what the thread was about..any clue?
curious as to what the thread was about..any clue?
curious as to what the thread was about..any clue?
There's a very high chance that it was nothing more than really bad 'science'.
As someone deleted my thread I am no longer going to post on this forum.
Adios.
I deleted the thread because it was junk science spam.
The guy may be a nutcase but there was no need to delete his thread (and that's coming from me who made it clear to him I think he talks a load of ****). His belief differs from the mainstream and he spends a lot of time researching alternative medicines and from I have seen he has not promoted any website. Yes we may not agree with what he has to say but he still has a right to express his beliefs and opinions since this is what a discussion board is for.
I agree with you on the whole but there are other issues to consider when he's posting junk health 'science'.
If he posts some junk about the dangers of immunisation and another poster's child dies of measles who is responsible?
The parent, certainly - they shouldn't be so stupid. Gifter would be too. But to some extent I'd be responsible as publisher here - as would any mod who allowed that **** into the public domain.
I don't think that's why Milo has acted here, it sounds more like Gifter was posting the same nonsense he's posted in any number of other threads. In which case, there's no need for another thread on it, he can just bump some of his old trash.
Absolutely. I've no issue with Gifter posting pseudo-science on here but I don't think he needs to start a new post every time.
If we had a religious poster on here who kept starting threads on their deity of choice, I would take the same approach.