balesleftboot
Sean Davis
I'm 38 and don't like the changes I've seen in the game in my time following it.
The players are contracted to the clubs, they probably can't turn around and tell the club they're not playing.
Let's see how that develops.
I cant believe that a vote of 14 teams would be enough to kick a club out. I'd expect it to take a higher threshold than that
I cant believe that a vote of 14 teams would be enough to kick a club out. I'd expect it to take a higher threshold than that
For sure, much as it's disgusting if it's going to happen it's better we're in than out. In a way Levy has done well here, we are the only team in it who has pretty much won nothing for 30 years.
This is the logical conclusion of money swamping the game and let's not forget that this is how the Premier League started with the 'elite' clubs threatening a complete break with the football League. If this happens, it will be over and out for me regarding Spurs, the end of a love affair that began in 1967.
The players are contracted to the clubs, they probably can't turn around and tell the club they're not playing.
Can see a lot of solicitors becoming very rich over Derp
"Clubs have the opportunity to propose new rules or amendments at the Shareholder meeting. Each Member Club is entitled to one vote and all rule changes and major commercial contracts require the support of at least a two-thirds vote, or 14 clubs, to be agreed."
https://www.premierleague.com/about#:~:text=Each Member Club is entitled,14 clubs, to be agreed.
Kicking a club out is probably a different kettle of fish but they can put in a rule that you can't play for non fifa sanctioned tournaments going by the above
Sadly with the lack of financial control of the EPL this ESL was inevitably.
English Premier-league own goal!
impressive digging, and I agree with your view. Could be interesting!
football coming back to Pro Evo
Notice the official title is “The Super League” (no mention of Europe). Can see top Asian, US and/or South American teams having occasional entrants.
I personally think we tolerate a lot in football that is already crap:
> Champions League format worse than 3 individual cups.
> CL money & oil money creating a divide.
> All PL matches not even on TV
> Needing 3 service providers to watch those matches that are.
> Sky having too much power.
> Too many pointless internationals / friendlies
> UEFA/FIFA run by stuffy old guys stuck in the past.
-
Hopefully as a silver lining the SL will break some of those. For me, a super league of sorts is inevitable, so happy we are in it.
I don't like the Champions League either but it's better than this. I believe only the champions should compete in the CL. Change the UEFA Cup back to how it was ( and it would be a stronger competition again) and put s bit of prestige back into the domestic cups. That's how I'd want it.So serious question for some people
- What makes CL (another rebranded, commercial piece of brick) so much more legitimate than Superleague? to the point where you are questioning Spurs participation or your support?
Am I the only one that sees only upside?
- My club is taken care of for the next 23 years financially
- I get home and away games against Europe's elite (no more unknown sides in the middle of nowhere)
What is the protest? some kind of sense of integrity (with FA/PL/UEFA/CL?)? you think West Ham/Everton/Burnley would sacrifice a dollar of potential revenue for the betterment of Spurs? yet you expect our owners to do something for the league/pyramid?
The arguments seem quite pretentious honestly but open to a discussion