• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

This is the point. Tavistock owns the flats, land, rent accumulated directly from Tottenham Hotspur FC. They have made massive wealth off the back of borrowing in Tottenham Hotspur FC name.

I don't get why folks don't get this. We should be one of the richest clubs in the land with vast amounts of free from ffp money to spend on players. Arsenal use it. Why don't we?
Again making brick up or else believing what others have said without doing any fact checking.

Tottenham Hotspur Property Company Limited, a subsidary of the Tottenham Hotspur Limited, owns the property, not Tavistock. It has made very little profit, though that should change with the completion of developments including the hotel.
 
That was a loan from Uncle Joe mate. It wasn't charity.

This is the point. Tavistock owns the flats, land, rent accumulated directly from Tottenham Hotspur FC. They have made massive wealth off the back of borrowing in Tottenham Hotspur FC name.

I don't get why folks don't get this. We should be one of the richest clubs in the land with vast amounts of free from ffp money to spend on players. Arsenal use it. Why don't we?
Come to the debate using Google rather than Twitter.
 
Again making brick up or else believing what others have said without doing any fact checking.

Tottenham Hotspur Property Company Limited, a subsidary of the Tottenham Hotspur Limited, owns the property, not Tavistock. It has made very little profit, though that should change with the completion of developments including the hotel.

I mean its all abit broken record but there is this whole "everything they do is bad" story that some spin is not reality. There is a balance to their tenure which is some good some bad, for me its as simple as that in a broad stroke. Some just won't have it though
 
Last edited:
I mean its all abit broken record but there is this whole "everything they do is bad" story that some spin that just is not reality. There is a balance to their tenure which is some good some bad, for me its as simple as that in a broad stroke. Some just won't have it though
Plenty of room for debate on some of the football decisions, especially in the last 5 years, but to try and make out that they are draining the club of money is ridiculous. Even the slightest bit of fact checking shows this is not the case.
 
Plenty of room for debate on some of the football decisions, especially in the last 5 years, but to try and make out that they are draining the club of money is ridiculous. Even the slightest bit of fact checking shows this is not the case.

But also I take abit of a holistic view on the fact that where we are now as a financial, footballing progress as in up there amongst the top clubs yearly give or take and an infrastructure beyond most in the global game, we are now a totally different club to the one they took over, we are also more attractive in the global market for a take over TBH. So if off the back of that progress and infrastructure they walk away richer from the sale of the club, so be it, I won't be bothered or wet the bed about it and I don't see it as some massive conspiracy like some do
 
This is the point. Tavistock owns the flats, land, rent accumulated directly from Tottenham Hotspur FC. They have made massive wealth off the back of borrowing in Tottenham Hotspur FC name.
Did they? Show us the proof of this accusation, please.

I don't get why folks don't get this. We should be one of the richest clubs in the land with vast amounts of free from ffp money to spend on players. Arsenal use it. Why don't we?
Why should we be one of the richest clubs with vast amounts of money? Are you saying we spent that money on flats and hotels rather than players?
 
Plenty of room for debate on some of the football decisions, especially in the last 5 years, but to try and make out that they are draining the club of money is ridiculous. Even the slightest bit of fact checking shows this is not the case.
Some views are so entrenched that it’s virtually impossible to change them. Providing clear facts clearly doesn’t work. The only thing that might work was if Ange was to win a trophy this year. That would instantly blunt their main argument.
 
Did they? Show us the proof of this accusation, please.


Why should we be one of the richest clubs with vast amounts of money? Are you saying we spent that money on flats and hotels rather than players?


I’m saying the money generated from Tottenham Hotspur FC’s name has been used to buy land and flats and we dont get the revenue.

Tavistock gets it. Its a clever way they have used the Arsenal system but not shared the wealth. We dont get Tavistock profits. It’s separate to Tottenham Hotspur plc. Yet the only reason they have the land is because of us. Plus we are liable for the debts! But hey. Give it a couple more years and I’m sure Daniel will come through for the team.

We are sitting on a stadium that has a minimum of £300 million in stadium rights. But will Dan release it and give it to a manager so we could genuinely and more importantly under ffp rules compete?

Nah. That money is needed for when they sell.

27 million to 4 billion in a quarter of a century. Amazing. But still folks think he has Tottenham in his blood….

Would love to see the Tavistock financials…
 
I’m saying the money generated from Tottenham Hotspur FC’s name has been used to buy land and flats and we dont get the revenue.

Tavistock gets it. Its a clever way they have used the Arsenal system but not shared the wealth. We dont get Tavistock profits. It’s separate to Tottenham Hotspur plc. Yet the only reason they have the land is because of us. Plus we are liable for the debts! But hey. Give it a couple more years and I’m sure Daniel will come through for the team.

We are sitting on a stadium that has a minimum of £300 million in stadium rights. But will Dan release it and give it to a manager so we could genuinely and more importantly under ffp rules compete?

Nah. That money is needed for when they sell.

27 million to 4 billion in a quarter of a century. Amazing. But still folks think he has Tottenham in his blood….

Would love to see the Tavistock financials…
how are Tavistock buying these things?
Using THFC limited companies?
I think that’s what your saying
 
I’m saying the money generated from Tottenham Hotspur FC’s name has been used to buy land and flats and we dont get the revenue.

Tavistock gets it. Its a clever way they have used the Arsenal system but not shared the wealth. We dont get Tavistock profits. It’s separate to Tottenham Hotspur plc. Yet the only reason they have the land is because of us. Plus we are liable for the debts! But hey. Give it a couple more years and I’m sure Daniel will come through for the team.

We are sitting on a stadium that has a minimum of £300 million in stadium rights. But will Dan release it and give it to a manager so we could genuinely and more importantly under ffp rules compete?

Nah. That money is needed for when they sell.

27 million to 4 billion in a quarter of a century. Amazing. But still folks think he has Tottenham in his blood….

Would love to see the Tavistock financials…
What part of Tottenham Hotspur Property Company Limited own the properties do you not understand? Anything that Tavistock own they have bought at market value and not got it for free.

There's no naming rights because it's needed for when they sell??? You realise that makes zero sense and shows your complete lack of understanding of anything in this area.

27m to 4 billion shows that a great job has been done in increasing the revenues and infrastructure and has nothing to do with whether he has or hasn't Tottenham in his blood. Would you prefer that we were still only worth 27m and therefore a lower division club?

As for Tavistock financials, they are on the stock exxchange so publish financial results. There's this great invention called a search engine that you can use to search for that information, try Google, ask Danny Rose for how to use it. 20 seconds using it gave me this link so you can check them out: Tavistock Financial Reports. Although going by the rubbish you've being spouting so far I highly doubt you will understand anything in them
 
Last edited:
You can always tell when it’s school half term.

What part of Tottenham Hotspur Property Company Limited own the properties do you not understand? Anything that Tavistock own they have bought at market value and not got it for free.

There's no naming rights because it's needed for when they sell??? You realise that makes zero sense and shows your complete understanding of anything in this area.

27m to 4 billion shows that a great job has been done in increasing the revenues and infrastructure and has nothing to do with whether he has or hasn't Tottenham in his blood. Would you prefer that we were still only worth 27m and therefore a lower division club?

As for Tavistock financials, they are on the stock exxchange so publish financial results. There's this great invention called a search engine that you can use to search for that information, try Google, ask Danny Rose for how to use it. 20 seconds using it gave me this link so you can check them out: Tavistock Financial Reports. Although going by the rubbish you've being spouting so far I highly doubt you will understand anything in them
When someone is this far off, I smell a provocateur.

Don't rise ..times precious
 
Back