Not really. People see things differently. The club undoubtedly went backwards for a few years after Poch and it was completely understandable for fans to question the direction of the club at times. I’ll balance out my view and say ENIC have done many good things for us. It would be wrong to say otherwise. However the objective of football is to win and the club is in the middle of one of the most barren runs of trophies in our history. Is that all ENIC’s fault? No, but they’re partly responsible or accountable as they own the club just as any owner of any business is responsible for the overall success of the company. I’ve seen people say “well ENIC don’t actually kick a ball and cant influence things on the pitch” or words to that effect but I disagree. They get credit for setting the conditions and laying the foundations when we achieve a top four finish, the same principle should be applied when we don’t achieve our goals. A manager can only influence so many things with regards to tactics, substitutions and formations. But they’re held accountable when things go wrong and are credited when things go well. Same applies for ownership albeit for different reasons.
In our history, for how long have oligarchs and countries owned competing teams? Winning the majority of trophies. We're playing by different rules now.