Bishop
John Lacy
The season before. When we didn't have a striker that could finish his dinner.Was that the year Redknapp decided he wanted the England job and we blew a 14 point lead to the arse?
The season before. When we didn't have a striker that could finish his dinner.Was that the year Redknapp decided he wanted the England job and we blew a 14 point lead to the arse?
Fudge no, there is something deeply disturbing about that guy.Anyone got elon musks number? Just sold $5bn of his shares in tesla. Bit of a taco but he has enough money to buy us.
Fudge no, there is something deeply disturbing about that guy.
Might explain why City weren't willing to go all out to get Kane.
Might explain why City weren't willing to go all out to get Kane.
With player amortisation they could get him. The price is spread over the contract.
Plus teams with strong squads can make the decision to take the fine and transfer ban for the 2 year period.
Plus teams with strong squads can make the decision to take the fine and transfer ban for the 2 year period.
As far as I'm aware player amortisation isn't used here, but could be totally wrong. The payments out (transfer wages etc) made are all that matters.With player amortisation they could get him. The price is spread over the contract.
As far as I'm aware player amortisation isn't used here, but could be totally wrong. The payments out (transfer wages etc) made are all that matters.
Are we hiding 400m somewhere, or is this a completely irrelevant piece of maths?
It basically just shows what we’d be allowed to spend if the owners injected liquidity themselves or diluted their stake to do so, or loaded more debt onto THFC (though we have quite enough of that already thanks).Are we hiding 400m somewhere, or is this a completely irrelevant piece of maths?
It basically just shows what we’d be allowed to spend if the owners injected liquidity themselves or diluted their stake to do so, or loaded more debt onto THFC (though we have quite enough of that already thanks).