• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Dusan Vlahovic

nattenskonge said:
And that is Kane foult??? We not winning games has alot with fking it up in defence and losing points after min 80… Kane has done his job for years…
Click to expand...

Well it didn’t help when he was barely fit and insisted, according to reports, that he would play in the CL Final. Also has affected us in other matches when he’s returned not match fit and either been injured again or not at his usual level.

There’s no doubting his quality, but I think he would have done everyone a favour not rushing back from injury as often as he has done in the past. He would likely then ha e suffered less injuries, and been fresher and we might have achieved better results with a fully fit team.
 
El Guepardo said:
Well it didn’t help when he was barely fit and insisted, according to reports, that he would play in the CL Final. Also has affected us in other matches when he’s returned not match fit and either been injured again or not at his usual level.

There’s no doubting his quality, but I think he would have done everyone a favour not rushing back from injury as often as he has done in the past. He would likely then ha e suffered less injuries, and been fresher and we might have achieved better results with a fully fit team.
Click to expand...

Perhaps if we had some options in reserve he wouldn't have been required to rush back so often...
 
nattenskonge said:
And that is Kane foult??? We not winning games has alot with fking it up in defence and losing points after min 80… Kane has done his job for years…
Click to expand...
Nowhere in that post does it say its Kane's fault, doesn't make it less true.
You win as a team, you lose as a team, they take the plaudits when it goes well, they should all take stick when it goes wrong.
No one, not even Harry should be immune to that.
 
nattenskonge said:
And that is Kane foult??? We not winning games has alot with fking it up in defence and losing points after min 80… Kane has done his job for years…
Click to expand...
Not necessarily Kane’s fault but you win and lose as a team and everyone has their jobs to do.

I think there’s a stat that says something like in finals Kane has no goals, assists or shots on target. Or something like that. In that regard you could argue that he wasn’t doing his job.

But you’re general point still stands. He does his job on the whole. And more consistently than others over the years
 
IulianSteaua said:
People talking how easy it would be to replace players like Kane when we weren't able to replace simple guys like Walker or Eriksen. Harry leaving will be a big blow for us, we are selling the league's TOP scorer and assists and we HOPE the new guy will be as good. Hope strategy gets you mid table, while City getting PL proven high value home grown players gets you the title. We only have 2 or 3 high value players and we are selling one of them, our best. That's what this window is.
Click to expand...

£900M gets you the title, and even then you end up with brick like Ake, Jesus, Torres (I could put Mendy and Stones in there but it will go off on a tangent)

what strategy are you suggesting? we aren't trying to sell Kane, so what's the point?
 
billyiddo said:
Perhaps if we had some options in reserve he wouldn't have been required to rush back so often...
Click to expand...

Or perhaps if we as a club were not so afraid of offending him (because we actually knew him) that we played him in every fudging game he wanted, vs. allowing us to rotate both to protect him and to help give some of those backup options the game/team time needed to be viable?
 
Raziel said:
Or perhaps if we as a club were not so afraid of offending him (because we actually knew him) that we played him in every fudging game he wanted, vs. allowing us to rotate both to protect him and to help give some of those backup options the game/team time needed to be viable?
Click to expand...

What's more likely, a club with no back up CFs rushing back their injured player or a club kowtowing to an unfit players demands to play against it's better judgement?
 
billyiddo said:
What's more likely, a club with no back up CFs rushing back their injured player or a club kowtowing to an unfit players demands to play against it's better judgement?
Click to expand...
Or the club trusted that player as he passed his fitness test…. Which meant he was fit enough to play, but not match fit
 
billyiddo said:
What's more likely, a club with no back up CFs rushing back their injured player or a club kowtowing to an unfit players demands to play against it's better judgement?
Click to expand...

On recent behaviour? or with the CL final example? with the fact that Son typically scores at a higher rate without Harry in side? you tell me
 
Raziel said:
£900M gets you the title, and even then you end up with brick like Ake, Jesus, Torres (I could put Mendy and Stones in there but it will go off on a tangent)

what strategy are you suggesting? we aren't trying to sell Kane, so what's the point?
Click to expand...
Kane is gone imo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back