I watched most of it while at work, on screens across the room a bit.
Everytime I looked up it seemed Siggy was involved. Obviously not the case?
I was very impressed by Rose tonight by the way. Sure, it's Tbilsi but I think he's very confident in his ability. He is quick so can get out of any mistakes made, a bit like Kyle Walker at times. He has a decent cross on him and has that extra burst to get round players. I personally wouldn't lose any sleep if we didn't "upgrade" on him. So far, he's done nothing that has made me think, damn we need to get rid of him. I imagine it's because he is English and his name isnt Danilo Rossi that he isn't rated more.
He was involved in most of our play, slightly baffled by the ratings on here myself.
I'm not baffled at all. there's a few people who have no time for him because he kept america's most famous player out of the team.
I'm a big Sigurdsson fan and was very happy when we signed him so I'm not one of those rating him low for the sake of it. I rated him higher than Dempsey.
I just feel he looks out of place in our team and I am not sure why. He has the ability, his passing is good, his touch is usually good, he has a great shot on him and he works hard but something isn't clicking. A few times yesterday he tried to play a tricky pass when a simple one was on, another few times where he would have had a shot on goal if his touch was better and it wasn't. I just get the feeling he is trying a little TOO hard, he didn't look to happy when he got subbed, I hope that was because he realised he played poor as opposed to being annoyed that he was subbed.
Spot on, yesterday was perfect example. I do rate Siggy and he came in to some good form end of last season I thought he was better against Palace then he was yesterday. I still feel he has the ability to be a key player for us, however just watching the game yesterday he didn't play very well especially as he seems to be given the free role behind striker where he should be our main creator. All you have to see is Chadli only had around 35 minutes on the pitch and created 3 goals
Involved - yes. Productively involved - (unfortunately) no
pretty much this, imv
When he left the pitch we were 3-0 up so he should always be so unproductive.
Or are we going along with that bloke on here's argument that we win games despite players not because of them?
You can if the opposition aren't very good.