• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Contingency planning : When Ange is sacked, who should replace him?

metalgear said:
Board members have a big say on the chairman's salary and bonus. And vice versa.
Click to expand...

Let me explain better.

When you're a small company (not just football) you often see the C-suite operating as the board as well as their day jobs. Example, the FD/CFO sits on the board for the company he or she works for. In our case, Collecott. As you grow, the model shifts so the FD is just a company employee. On the board you might have former CEO's of other companies or even industries. You are introducing more independent advisors. That removes the conflict where one of the board's function is not performing in their role. It creates a healthy tension between the board and the c-suite.

It would be like Spurs moving to a model where our board has a senior Tavistock group executive sitting on it. Someone that isn't on the ENIC side. Perhaps someone like Joe Lewis's niece who I believe is the major trustee of his entire estate. I'm sure Sugar would be too divisive, but perhaps another former chairman of a football club that can bring a different perspective.

I'm not sure it will happen yet as we may not be big enough to bifurcate the roles. One day I'm hoping we will.

What I've heard from time to time is that Levy's own son is being groomed to take over. Then you might see Daniel move to be a board member only and his son becomes the chairman.
 
Bedfordspurs said:
All are non sporting roles
So nothing to do with the football set up
Click to expand...

Spurs have the 2 main pillars commercial and football. They would then inevitably have shared services functions like finance working across both. Collecott's team would be very tactically involved on a day to day basis with Munn and his team. They would be resources for them to use and probably costed to his football P&L. I can't believe Munn would be building his own legal, finance, marketing, comms etc as separate from the ones that support the commercial team. I would bet that these folks who support Munn report to Collecott, Cullen and Caplhorn. My guess is that all the comms and social media we see is run out of the commercial team supporting Munn as well. Example, signing a new player and running all the press releases and videos etc.

I don't think it will be as separate as you paint it. I would expect total integration. Munn even said himself that the commercial team create all the revenue. That implied that him and his teams are just overhead into the same P&L. Bit strange if you ask me as the product that is sold is his players and they create the revenue. But it is how they choose to run things and it seems to work quite well nowadays.
 
Muttley said:
Spurs have the 2 main pillars commercial and football. They would then inevitably have shared services functions like finance working across both. Collecott's team would be very tactically involved on a day to day basis with Munn and his team. They would be resources for them to use and probably costed to his football P&L. I can't believe Munn would be building his own legal, finance, marketing, comms etc as separate from the ones that support the commercial team. I would bet that these folks who support Munn report to Collecott, Cullen and Caplhorn. My guess is that all the comms and social media we see is run out of the commercial team supporting Munn as well. Example, signing a new player and running all the press releases and videos etc.

I don't think it will be as separate as you paint it. I would expect total integration. Munn even said himself that the commercial team create all the revenue. That implied that him and his teams are just overhead into the same P&L. Bit strange if you ask me as the product that is sold is his players and they create the revenue. But it is how they choose to run things and it seems to work quite well nowadays.
Click to expand...
I think and I know from what ive been told the roles are very distinct
The football side is Munns area reporting into the board/levy
The other sides report on the same way
They work across each other but don’t confuse what some do that PR or finance has any influence on the football side
They may have an opinion of course because if the football side has an impact on the other but it’s quite distinct
Unless it’s changed in the last year
 
glorygloryeze said:
Is Levy actually the owner of THFC though?
Click to expand...
He owns a huge chunk in reality and is the pseudo owner
People will shout Tavistock and Lewis but they have left levy to run the club as he sees fit since day 1
And as I’ve repeated… he can take money out however he wants but actually does it legally and pays tax
That’s not to support or start an argument of if he earns it or deserves it
 
Muttley said:
Let me explain better.

When you're a small company (not just football) you often see the C-suite operating as the board as well as their day jobs. Example, the FD/CFO sits on the board for the company he or she works for. In our case, Collecott. As you grow, the model shifts so the FD is just a company employee. On the board you might have former CEO's of other companies or even industries. You are introducing more independent advisors. That removes the conflict where one of the board's function is not performing in their role. It creates a healthy tension between the board and the c-suite.

It would be like Spurs moving to a model where our board has a senior Tavistock group executive sitting on it. Someone that isn't on the ENIC side. Perhaps someone like Joe Lewis's niece who I believe is the major trustee of his entire estate. I'm sure Sugar would be too divisive, but perhaps another former chairman of a football club that can bring a different perspective.

I'm not sure it will happen yet as we may not be big enough to bifurcate the roles. One day I'm hoping we will.

What I've heard from time to time is that Levy's own son is being groomed to take over. Then you might see Daniel move to be a board member only and his son becomes the chairman.
Click to expand...
Great.... Nepo baby II
 
Gutter Boy said:
Dad on maneuvers

https://twitter.com/x/status/1890071252108496953
Click to expand...


giphy.gif
 
Mikey10 said:
Just can’t see him walking away from the USA job until post-World Cup, but looks like he’s enjoying making life even more difficult for our board in the meantime.
Click to expand...

of course he would

nobody takes international football seriously
 
Mikey10 said:
Just can’t see him walking away from the USA job until post-World Cup, but looks like he’s enjoying making life even more difficult for our board in the meantime.
Click to expand...
What is keeping him?

Minor nation, brick players, small salary, fascist hell hole
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back