parklane1
Tony Galvin
Ok wait, here's a new question in theory.
Real Madrid offer us a straight swap, Eriksen and Bale.
Would you take it?
No Way
Not sure I agree with that.
I agree
Ok wait, here's a new question in theory.
Real Madrid offer us a straight swap, Eriksen and Bale.
Would you take it?
Not sure I agree with that.
Ok wait, here's a new question in theory.
Real Madrid offer us a straight swap, Eriksen and Bale.
Would you take it?
Ok wait, here's a new question in theory.
Real Madrid offer us a straight swap, Eriksen and Bale.
Would you take it?
No way. Dele doesnt have the skill set to play like Eriksen.If as Nayim says we sell Eriksen and change the way we play then Dele could well step in and replace Eriksen in terms of goals and assists. Dele isnt a playmaker like Eriksen, and I wouldnt go as far as to suggest he is a 'readymade replacement' like that article says - his stints in the deeper role were less than impressive. But played further forward he is proven to have the goals and assists stats to compete with Eriksen and lets not forget he isnt anywhere near his peak yet....
I didn't read that article as suggesting he could, but that he could play in a slightly deeper role and do well there. I think it requires a re-jig of the midfield to keep him back. And he'd still be able to ghost in like a better Fat Frank Lampard.No way. Dele doesnt have the skill set to play like Eriksen.
Probably not but id wager if we had Bale in the starting XI on Saturday over Eriksen we'd have won the game
Probably not but id wager if we had Bale in the starting XI on Saturday over Eriksen we'd have won the game
No way. Dele doesnt have the skill set to play like Eriksen.
Dembele didn't have the passing to replace Modric. You don't need to replace players like for like. I would favour moving back to having our playmaker playing deeper and having more direct options in our forwards.
Considering getting the ball to the forwards wasn’t the issue, I would suggest if he had played instead of Alli/Kane/Son we would have won.
I think it was.
How many times did we end up going square when someone decided not to take the man on or try to break lines. I understand heat was a factor, and agree that when we did get the match-ups we failed to take advantage, but I think the thought was we would've doubled our chances and I tend to agree. 10% more purpose driving forward and we'd have won.
We managed to break through 3/4 when we had at least the same numbers and Alli played the wrong pass or Sons touch killed the move.
The one by Alli in the first half was the worst - 3 on 3 and plays a pass for a goal kick.
Replace bale with one of those and we would have worked something.
Better still, start with Eriksen deep next to Sissoko and have a 4 of Bale/Alli/Son and Kane to ensure double the chances. I think that is the overall point. I would further ponder whether Winks/Sissoko and then that front four would've created more 3 on 3s? We would still have needed a wing-back with more verve on the right (Aurier in this case?). It is obviously a bit of hindsight entertainment.
Yes, that Alli pass was certainly badly "off" but I wish Sonny had been shooting quicker and more decisively as he does when in form and flow.