FatBloke
Niko Kranjcar
Pity my subscription to the OED has expired. The lesser Cambridge dictionary has this to say:What exactly do you think Dynamic means? Because, honestly, its not a word Id use to describe Walker.
Much like Sissoko, Walker is more an athlete than footballer, IMO. Though he is of course a far superior footballer than Sissoko.
When you watch Walker, in an offensive capacity, he really is quite disappointing. And at City - again like Sissoko - he is completely out of his depth compared to his team mates when it comes to basic skill, technique and intelligence.
I rate him as a very good defender, particularly in 1 on 1 situations. And his athleticism means he has remarkable recovery powers when he is (quite frequently) caught out of position.
Attacking? Trippier makes him look silly. And people here barely rate Tripps.
dynamic adjective Full of energy.
Other than that, the word generally refers to motion. If that isn't applicable to Walker, then what is?
I agree that Trippier is more dangerous in attack -- like Davies, his attacking game is about reading the play and delivering the cross. I also agree that Walker is the better defender, esp. 1-on-1. After a few years of Poch's special fullback sauce, anyway.
The point someone else made about Walker being dangerous just because of his threat is a good one too. There's nothing like sheer pace to disrupt the opposition -- like the rare rugby player who can break the line. So I don't see it as anything like a clear choice between Walker and Trippier -- I know the latter will give me more dangerous balls into the box, but the former is going to cause more problems for the opposition defence that the likes of Eriksen, Alli and Son can then exploit.