Any one considering changing their vote?
They have fewer shots per game (15) than the rest of the top seven and average less possession (56.4 percent) than three of their biggest rivals (Emirates Marketing Project, Arsenal and Liverpool). They concede more shots per game (13.5) than the rest of the top seven once again -- and even Southampton -- and rank eighth for tackles per match (19.5). Indeed, the only key area in which no team comes close to United statistically is chance conversion. Their 15.1 percent is streets ahead in the league, with Reading in second with 12.7 percent, and it will inevitably draw most people's attention back to one man.
Guardian said:Teams
West Ham: Jaaskelainen, Reid, Nolan, Jarvis, Carroll, O'Brien, Collins, Demel, Diame, J Cole, O'Neil. Subs: C Cole, Collison, Vaz Te, Taylor, Pogatetz, Chamakh, Spiegel.
Spurs: Lloris, Not Bale, Not Bale, Not Bale, Not Bale, Not Bale, Bale, Not Bale, Not Bale, Not Bale, Not Bale. Subs: Some people who are Not Bale..
The Guardian's team line-ups - I hope Lennon and co have a blinder tonight and stuff these jibes up where the sun don't shine
According to the Spammers we're a one chimp team...
sky ****s putting up a little table of us with and without bales goals. With we are third obviously and without we are ninth
Ok now do that with Manure without RVP or Liverscum without Suarez oh yeh and Arse without Giroud or Barca without Messi or how about Real without Madrid.
cuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunts
I agree. Such a lazy stat to bring out, really adds nothing to a discussion about a player.
Of course if you took away the top scorer of a team and replaced him with someone who scored no goals they would suffer. Thank you captain obvious.
Well if a lone chimp can beat West Ham, what does it make them ?