• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

American politics

But the outbreak of measles would have likely (more than likely) contributed to the baby having it, if thats not a concern for you then frankly it beggars belief TBH

No you cannot say that with any confidence. Most people carry measels antibodies in their system via vaccination. As would someone that’s had measels. In both cases, they will typically pass those antibodies on to the child.

This is more likely to be the case than the mother having measels and if it were we almost certainly would have been told about it given the desperation to report on a measels death.
 
No you cannot say that with any confidence. Most people carry measels antibodies in their system via vaccination. As would someone that’s had measels. In both cases, they will typically pass those antibodies on to the child.

This is more likely to be the case than the mother having measels and if it were we almost certainly would have been told about it given the desperation to report on a measels death.

Antibodies would provide passive immunity not full blown measles

If your theory was more likely then the world would be giving birth to millions of kids with measles because the parents were vaxxed
 
Antibodies would provide passive immunity not full blown measles

If your theory was more likely then the world would be giving birth to millions of kids with measles because the parents were vaxxed

The child did not have the measles virus. The child that died of a spleen rupture was also found to have measles antibodies in the pathology report.

About 93% of US newborns historically have detectable measles antibodies at birth, typically passed on by the vaccinated mother, per the CDC.


Based on birth rates, the PA population and the number of active measels cases, the percentage chance of being born with measels pass on by a mother in PA is 0.0000000017%
 
Last edited:

Why not post the full article? In the same paragraph he says

On Thursday morning, Diamantoni told TribLive his office was investigating the death of a newborn child who had tested positive for measles during an autopsy. But the cause of death was a “traumatic laceration of the spleen,” he said. In the opinion of forensic pathologist Dr. Wayne Ross, measles was not a contributing factor in the infant’s death, Diamantoni said.




 
Why not post the full article? In the same paragraph he says

On Thursday morning, Diamantoni told TribLive his office was investigating the death of a newborn child who had tested positive for measles during an autopsy. But the cause of death was a “traumatic laceration of the spleen,” he said. In the opinion of forensic pathologist Dr. Wayne Ross, measles was not a contributing factor in the infant’s death, Diamantoni said.





Because I was addressing the claim the baby didnt have measles
 
Because I was addressing the claim the baby didnt have measles

The interview with Diamantoni with Lancaster County Coroner Steve Diamantoni, who is not a Dr as you claimed, goes on to say;

The cause of death was not from the measles. The newborn died shortly after birth from a laceration of the spleen, although measles antibodies were present in postmortem testing.
 
The interview with Diamantoni with Lancaster County Coroner Steve Diamantoni, who is not a Dr as you claimed, goes on to say;

The cause of death was not from the measles. The newborn died shortly after birth from a laceration of the spleen, although measles antibodies were present in postmortem testing.

And said they baby had measles, you think a coroner would say a baby had measles if they didn't? Come on
 
And said they baby had measles, you think a coroner would say a baby had measles if they didn't? Come on

Measels antibodies is not having measels. They have not said the baby had measels. It’s clarified in the article you posted a screenshot from which you either did not read or deliberatly took a small part from and left out all the rest of the context.
 
Measels antibodies is not having measels. They have not said the baby had measels. It’s clarified in the article you posted a screenshot from which you either did not read or deliberatly took a small part from and left out all the rest of the context.

No it doesnt it says it wasnt a contributing factor, not that the baby didnt have measles

Dr literally said "the baby tested positive for measles" they literally would not have made such a statement had the baby not had measles. You dont make a statement like that if the baby did not have measles
 
No it doesnt it says it wasnt a contributing factor, not that the baby didnt have measles

Dr literally said "the baby tested positive for measles" they literally would not have made such a statement had the baby not had measles. You dont make a statement like that if the baby did not have measles

The person writing the article says that. The actual person you are quoting, who again is not a Dr, actually said.

“The cause of death was not from the measles. The newborn died shortly after birth from a laceration of the spleen, although measles antibodies were present in postmortem testing
 
The person writing the article says that. The actual person you are quoting, who again is not a Dr, actually said.

“The cause of death was not from the measles. The newborn died shortly after birth from a laceration of the spleen, although measles antibodies were present in postmortem testing”

Well he is quoted as "Dr Diamantoni" so I took it on face value and it was a statement from him to the reporter hence "Diamantoni told TribLive his office was investigating the death of a newborn child who had tested positive for measles during an autopsy"

A coroner, Dr or whoever would not say a baby had measles as a statement if they didn't, they would have said "the baby did not have measles but carried antibodies" to make sure any doubt was covered.
 
Well he is quoted as "Dr Diamantoni" so I took it on face value and it was a statement from him to the reporter hence "Diamantoni told TribLive his office was investigating the death of a newborn child who had tested positive for measles during an autopsy"

A coroner, Dr or whoever would not say a baby had measles as a statement if they didn't, they would have said "the baby did not have measles but carried antibodies" to make sure any doubt was covered.

Because they didn’t say that.

He is actually a Dr to be fair I was wrong about that.
 
So the reporting of their quote is false?.

What your posting is a summarised version of the quote wish misrepresents what he said

When they actually quote what he said he very clearly states the child tested positive for measles antibodies, which as I have detailed is very common.

The child did not have measles. Even if they did, it was not the cause of death as reported.

We also still have no information about the 2nd case. Diamantoni said, “We have no idea who that really is.”
 
What your posting is a summarised version of the quote wish misrepresents what he said

When they actually quote what he said he very clearly states the child tested positive for measles antibodies, which as I have detailed is very common.

The child did not have measles. Even if they did, it was not the cause of death as reported.

We also still have no information about the 2nd case.

Ok so if the baby did not have measles and only antibodies, not the full virus, do you not think a coroner who was as careful with his summary as him would have made that clear? I think he would

A question for you with all this, you seem really non plussed about a measles outbreak and more concerned about other factors, given the recent outbreaks do you not find them in the slightest bit concerning?
 
Ok so if the baby did not have measles and only antibodies, not the full virus, do you not think a coroner who was as careful with his summary as him would have made that clear? I think he would

A question for you with all this, you seem really non plussed about a measles outbreak and more concerned about other factors, given the recent outbreaks do you not find them in the slightest bit concerning?

I think saying the child tested positive for measles antibodies is clear enough. Especially in the context of the rest of his statements which is were. complete contraction of the Governors statement.

Not concerned at all.
 
Back