Which one is which?
No he means there was no sell on clause for Marmoush despite the initial reports Frankfurt never had a sell on clause at all and that all of the add-ons have already been met.So the Frankfurt sell on chat was true then. Makes the Savio signing more palatable (not that it wasn’t) can’t imagine Frankfurt will be too impressed
Aaaah right. CheersNo he means there was no sell on clause for Marmoush despite the initial reports Frankfurt never had a sell on clause at all and that all of the add-ons have already been met.
Or that their clauses expire this summer?No he means there was no sell on clause for Marmoush despite the initial reports Frankfurt never had a sell on clause at all and that all of the add-ons have already been met.
Or it’s been resolved out of the public eye in some other way with Frankfurt to keep them quiet. It wouldn’t surprise me given the length of time it’s taken to get the deal done and putting it out as ‘no clause’ is probably just to stop people sniffing around.Or that their clauses expire this summer?
A beautiful nutter.
We should use this instead of the little dancing guy.
Romano saying official tomorrow. Shane, would have been good to see him announced tonight
No he means there was no sell on clause for Marmoush despite the initial reports Frankfurt never had a sell on clause at all and that all of the add-ons have already been met.
I think the description from Fabrizio is way offSo he's on loan until June 2031 so can't play for us against City until the 2031-32 season?
Can you have loans that are that long? Seems off somehow.
Yes, it looks like loans are for a maximum length of one year (a footballing-year).I think the description from Fabrizio is way off
Surely ….
KinskyWho'd he score against in that pic?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.